Exploring the combination of individual and organizational-environmental factors in the expression of radical and incremental creativity

被引:1
作者
Jung, Suk [1 ]
Hong, Ah Jeong [2 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Human Resource Dev, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Educ, Heuseok Ro 84, Seoul 06974, South Korea
关键词
fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fs/QCA); incremental creativity; interaction of personal/environmental factors; radical creativity; EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; WORK ENGAGEMENT; RISK-TAKING; INNOVATION; MODEL; MANAGERIAL; EXPERTISE; KNOWLEDGE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/hrdq.21531
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Innovative products and services are key factors in corporate competitiveness, and the expression "employee creativity" is the top priority factor in leading corporate innovation. This study aims to investigate the differences between the predictive variables for the expression of radical and incremental creativity and the combinations of the predictive variables, which aid in the expression of two types of creativity. A research survey was conducted with 600 employees working in newspaper, broadcasting, and film businesses. The results were derived by conducting a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fs/QCA) on 513 useful samples. Using necessity and sufficiency analysis of a fs/QCA, the results indicate that the three personal factors-job expertise, creative process engagement, and work engagement-are commonly required for two types of creativity. Conversely, organizational-environmental factors, a risk-taking climate, and external networking behavior are only predictive variables of radical creativity. This study's results provide insights regarding the personal and environmental resources that employees must secure to express radical and incremental creativity. Because a clear difference was found in the factors required for the expression of the two types of creativity, based on the results of this study, Human Resource Development(HRD) can devise an effective method to support the expression of the two types of differential creativity.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning [J].
Amabile, Teresa M. ;
Pratt, Michael G. .
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 36, 2016, 36 :157-183
[2]  
AMABILE TM, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P123
[3]   Assessing the work environment for creativity [J].
Amabile, TM ;
Conti, R ;
Coon, H ;
Lazenby, J ;
Herron, M .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) :1154-1184
[4]   The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity [J].
Baer, John .
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2015, 37 (03) :165-178
[5]   The Crossover of Daily Work Engagement: Test of an Actor-Partner Interdependence Model [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Xanthopoulou, Despoina .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (06) :1562-1571
[6]   Information sharing and innovative work behavior: The role of work-based learning, challenging tasks, and organizational commitment [J].
Battistelli, Adalgisa ;
Odoardi, C. ;
Vandenberghe, C. ;
Di Napoli, G. ;
Piccione, L. .
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2019, 30 (03) :361-381
[7]   What most matters in strengthening educational competitiveness?: An Application of FS/QCA method [J].
Choi, Young-Chool ;
Lee, Ji-Hye .
7TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 2015, 197 :2182-2190
[8]  
Csikszentmihalyi M., 1999, HDB CREATIVITY, P313, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511807916.018, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511807916.018]
[9]  
DeBono E., 1985, Six hats thinking
[10]  
Dewett T., 2004, EUR J INNOV MANAG, V7, P257, DOI DOI 10.1108/14601060410565010