Trends in Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Utilization Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty From 2010 to 2022

被引:4
作者
Zhao, Amy Y. [1 ]
Kuyl, Emile-Victor [1 ]
Agarwal, Amil R. [1 ]
Das, Avilash [1 ]
Harris, Andrew B. [2 ]
Mcdaniel, Claire M. [2 ]
Gu, Alex [1 ]
Thakkar, Savyasachi C. [2 ]
Golladay, Gregory J. [3 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2300 M St, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
extended oral antibiotic; prophylaxis; primary total hip arthroplasty; revision total hip arthroplasty; periprosthetic joint infection; PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; RISK; INCREASES; MORTALITY; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.016
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In patients considered high-risk for infection, extended oral antibiotic (EOA) prophylaxis has been demonstrated to reduce rates of prosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although national guidelines regarding their use have not yet been created, the increase in literature surrounding EOA prophylaxis suggests a potential change in practice patterns. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends in utilization of EOA prophylaxis following THA from 2010 to 2022 and identify prescription patterns. Methods: A total of 646,059 primary THA and 51,879 aseptic revision THA patients were included in this study. Patients who underwent primary or aseptic revision THA between 2010 and 2022 were identified in a national administrative claims database. Rates and duration of EOA prescriptions were calculated. A secondary analysis examined rates of utilization across demographics, including patients considered high risk for infection. Results: From 2010 to 2022, utilization of EOA increased by 366% and 298% following primary and revision THA, respectively. Of patients prescribed postoperative antibiotics, 30% and 59% were prescribed antibiotics for more than 7 days following primary and revision THA, respectively. Rates of utilization were similar between high-risk individuals and the general population. Conclusions: Rates of utilization of EOA prophylaxis after THA have increased significantly since 2010. As current trends demonstrate a wide variation in prescription patterns, including in length of antibiotic duration and in patient population prescribed, guidelines surrounding the use of EOA prophylaxis after THA are necessary to promote antibiotic stewardship while preventing rates of periprosthetic joint infection. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1906 / 1910.e1
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antibiotic prophylaxis before tissue biopsy has no effect on culture results in presumed aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty
    De Groot, Jesse D.
    Brokelman, Roy G. B.
    Fransen, Bas L.
    Jiya, Tim U.
    Pakvis, Dean F. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT INFECTION, 2024, 9 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [22] Current Trends and Projected Burden of Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Korea Between 2010 and 2030
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Kang, Seung-Baik
    Chang, Chong Bum
    Moon, Sun-Young
    Lee, Young-Kyun
    Koo, Kyung-Hoi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [23] Not so Fast: Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Does Not Reduce 90-Day Infection Rate Following Joint Arthroplasty
    Flynn, Jade B.
    Yokhana, Sanar S.
    Wilson, Jacob M.
    Schultz, Jacob D.
    Hymel, Alicia M.
    Martin, John R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09) : S122 - S128
  • [24] Implant stability in revision total hip arthroplasty - Allograft bone packing following extended proximal femoral osteotomy
    Chassin, EP
    Silverton, CD
    Berzins, A
    Rosenberg, AG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1997, 12 (08) : 863 - 868
  • [25] How many doses and what type of antibiotic should be used as systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in primary hip and knee arthroplasty? A register-based study on 301,204 primary total and hemi- hip and total knee arthroplasties in Norway 2005-2023
    Lutro, Olav
    Tjorhom, Marianne Bollestad
    Leta, Tesfaye Hordofa
    Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
    Hallan, Geir
    Bruun, Trond
    Westberg, Marianne
    Wik, Tina Stromdal
    Pollmann, Christian Thomas
    Lygre, Stein Hakon
    Furnes, Ove
    Engesaeter, Lars
    Dale, Havard
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2025, 96 : 217 - 225
  • [26] Opioid Utilization After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Following Sequential Implementation of Statewide Legislation
    Kakalecik, Jaquelyn
    Sipavicius, Edvinas
    Miley, Emilie N.
    Horodyski, MaryBeth
    Gray, Chancellor F.
    Prieto, Hernan A.
    Parvataneni, Hari K.
    Deen, Justin T.
    [J]. ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2024, 25
  • [27] Comparing Inpatient Complication Rates between Octogenarians and Nonagenarians Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Nationally Representative Sample 2010-2014
    Dugdale, Evan M.
    Tybor, David
    Kain, Michael
    Smith, Eric L.
    [J]. GERIATRICS, 2019, 4 (04)
  • [28] Predicting extended hospital stay following revision total hip arthroplasty: a machine learning model analysis based on the ACS-NSQIP database
    Chen, Tony Lin-Wei
    RezazadehSaatlou, MohammadAmin
    Buddhiraju, Anirudh
    Seo, Henry Hojoon
    Shimizu, Michelle Riyo
    Kwon, Young-Min
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (09) : 4411 - 4420
  • [29] Time Trends in Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in California, 2007-2010
    Oh, Cheongeun
    Slover, James D.
    Bosco, Joseph A.
    Iorio, Richard
    Gold, Heather T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (08) : 2376 - 2380
  • [30] Preoperative opioid use is an independent risk factor for complication, revision, and increased health care utilization following primary total shoulder arthroplasty
    Wilson, Jacob M.
    Farley, Kevin X.
    Gottschalk, Michael B.
    Daly, Charles A.
    Wagner, Eric R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (05) : 1025 - 1033