Trends in Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Utilization Following Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty From 2010 to 2022

被引:4
作者
Zhao, Amy Y. [1 ]
Kuyl, Emile-Victor [1 ]
Agarwal, Amil R. [1 ]
Das, Avilash [1 ]
Harris, Andrew B. [2 ]
Mcdaniel, Claire M. [2 ]
Gu, Alex [1 ]
Thakkar, Savyasachi C. [2 ]
Golladay, Gregory J. [3 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2300 M St, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
extended oral antibiotic; prophylaxis; primary total hip arthroplasty; revision total hip arthroplasty; periprosthetic joint infection; PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; RISK; INCREASES; MORTALITY; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.016
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In patients considered high-risk for infection, extended oral antibiotic (EOA) prophylaxis has been demonstrated to reduce rates of prosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although national guidelines regarding their use have not yet been created, the increase in literature surrounding EOA prophylaxis suggests a potential change in practice patterns. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends in utilization of EOA prophylaxis following THA from 2010 to 2022 and identify prescription patterns. Methods: A total of 646,059 primary THA and 51,879 aseptic revision THA patients were included in this study. Patients who underwent primary or aseptic revision THA between 2010 and 2022 were identified in a national administrative claims database. Rates and duration of EOA prescriptions were calculated. A secondary analysis examined rates of utilization across demographics, including patients considered high risk for infection. Results: From 2010 to 2022, utilization of EOA increased by 366% and 298% following primary and revision THA, respectively. Of patients prescribed postoperative antibiotics, 30% and 59% were prescribed antibiotics for more than 7 days following primary and revision THA, respectively. Rates of utilization were similar between high-risk individuals and the general population. Conclusions: Rates of utilization of EOA prophylaxis after THA have increased significantly since 2010. As current trends demonstrate a wide variation in prescription patterns, including in length of antibiotic duration and in patient population prescribed, guidelines surrounding the use of EOA prophylaxis after THA are necessary to promote antibiotic stewardship while preventing rates of periprosthetic joint infection. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1906 / 1910.e1
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Increasing Utilization of Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Following Total Knee Arthroplasty From 2010 to 2022
    Zhao, Amy Y.
    Bergstein, Victoria E.
    Agarwal, Amil R.
    Das, Avilash
    Kurian, Shyam
    Marrache, Majd
    Golladay, Gregory J.
    Thakkar, Savyasachi C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (05) : 1112 - 1116
  • [2] Antibiotic prophylaxis in primary and revision hip arthroplasty
    Gradl, G.
    Horn, C.
    Postl, L. K. L.
    Miethke, T.
    Gollwitzer, H.
    ORTHOPADE, 2011, 40 (06): : 520 - 527
  • [3] Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Aseptic Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Revisions: A Preliminary Report
    Villa, Jesus M.
    Pannu, Tejbir S.
    Braaksma, William
    Higuera, Carlos A.
    Riesgo, Aldo M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (01) : 141 - 145
  • [4] Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does It Decrease Infection Risk?
    Bukowski, Brandon R.
    Owen, Aaron R.
    Turner, Travis W.
    Fruth, Kristin M.
    Osmon, Douglas R.
    Pagnano, Mark W.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (12) : 2460 - 2465
  • [5] Extended Antibiotic Prophylaxis Confers No Benefit Following Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Controlled Study
    Kuo, Feng-Chih
    Aalirezaie, Arash
    Goswami, Karan
    Shohat, Noam
    Blevins, Kier
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (11) : 2724 - 2729
  • [6] Should All Patients Receive Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis? Defining Its Role in Patients Undergoing Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty
    Bundschuh, Kyle E.
    Muf, Brian T.
    Ayeni, Ayomide M.
    Heo, Kevin Y.
    Khawaja, Sameer R.
    Tocio, Adam J.
    Karzon, Anthony L.
    Premkumar, Ajay
    Guild III, George N.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09) : S117 - S121.e4
  • [7] Extended length of stay in diabetic octogenarians following revision total hip arthroplasty
    Gupta, Puneet
    Quan, Theodore
    Patel, Chirag J.
    Manzi, Joseph E.
    Gu, Alex
    Tabaie, Sean
    Campbell, Joshua C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2023, 33 (04) : 1217 - 1222
  • [8] How Many Patients Qualify for Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Infection Following Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasties?
    Potter, Genna R.
    Feuchtenberger, Bennett W.
    Sowinski, Halee N.
    Roberts, Austin J.
    Siegel, Eric R.
    Dietz, Matthew J.
    Stambough, Jeffery B.
    Bedard, Nicholas A.
    Mears, Simon C.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (07) : 530 - 537
  • [9] Declining Trends in Septic Revision Following Total Knee Arthroplasty From 2010 to 2019: A National Cohort Analysis
    Chiu, Anthony K.
    Agarwal, Amil R.
    Peagler, Correggio
    Fraychineaud, Thomas
    Gu, Alex
    Parel, Philip M.
    Golladay, Gregory J.
    Thakkar, Savyasachi C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (02) : 480 - 486
  • [10] Rates of Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Among High-Risk and Standard-Risk Patients: 2009 to 2022
    Pisharody, Vivek A.
    Fuqua, Andrew
    Ayeni, Ayomide
    Erens, Greg A.
    Wilson, Jacob M.
    Premkumar, Ajay
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2025, 40 (05) : 1117 - 1122