Three Principles to REVISE People's Unethical Behavior

被引:91
作者
Ayal, Shahar [1 ]
Gino, Francesca [2 ]
Barkan, Rachel [3 ]
Ariely, Dan [4 ]
机构
[1] Interdisciplinary Ctr Herzliya IDC, Herzliyya, Israel
[2] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[4] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
dishonesty; ethical dissonance; moral reminders; social monitoring; self-concept; SLIPPERY SLOPE; TAX COMPLIANCE; DISHONESTY;
D O I
10.1177/1745691615598512
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Dishonesty and unethical behavior are widespread in the public and private sectors and cause immense annual losses. For instance, estimates of U.S. annual losses indicate $1 trillion paid in bribes, $270 billion lost due to unreported income, and $42 billion lost in retail due to shoplifting and employee theft. In this article, we draw on insights from the growing fields of moral psychology and behavioral ethics to present a three-principle framework we call REVISE. This framework classifies forces that affect dishonesty into three main categories and then redirects those forces to encourage moral behavior. The first principle, reminding, emphasizes the effectiveness of subtle cues that increase the salience of morality and decrease people's ability to justify dishonesty. The second principle, visibility, aims to restrict anonymity, prompt peer monitoring, and elicit responsible norms. The third principle, self-engagement, increases people's motivation to maintain a positive self-perception as a moral person and helps bridge the gap between moral values and actual behavior. The REVISE framework can guide the design of policy interventions to defeat dishonesty.
引用
收藏
页码:738 / 741
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Andreoni J, 1998, J ECON LIT, V36, P818
  • [2] [Anonymous], HARPERS
  • [3] The self-importance of moral identity
    Aquino, K
    Reed, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (06) : 1423 - 1440
  • [4] Ariely Dan., 2012, The Honest Truth About Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone-Especially Ourselves
  • [5] Ayal Shahar., 2011, The Social Psychology of Morality: Exploring the Causes of Good and Evil, DOI DOI 10.1037/13091-008
  • [6] The Pot Calling the Kettle Black: Distancing Response to Ethical Dissonance
    Barkan, Rachel
    Ayal, Shahar
    Gino, Francesca
    Ariely, Dan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2012, 141 (04) : 757 - 773
  • [7] Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting
    Bateson, Melissa
    Nettle, Daniel
    Roberts, Gilbert
    [J]. BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 2 (03) : 412 - 414
  • [8] Bazerman MaxH., 2011, BLIND SPOTS WHY WE F, V1st
  • [9] CRIME AND PUNISHMENT - ECONOMIC APPROACH
    BECKER, GS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1968, 76 (02) : 169 - 217
  • [10] Beshears J, 2015, HARVARD BUS REV, V93, P52