The role of different stakeholders in destination development

被引:22
作者
Komppula, Raija [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Sch Business, Tourism Business, Joensuu, Finland
关键词
Tourism; Finland; Entrepreneur; Stakeholders; Destination leadership; Destination governance; TOURISM DEVELOPMENT; LEADERSHIP; ORGANIZATIONS; GOVERNANCE; PARADIGM; IDENTITY; TRUST; POWER;
D O I
10.1108/TR-06-2015-0030
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to highlight the crucial role of individual people, entrepreneurs and other stakeholders in the development of a tourist destination during its life cycle. The purpose is to increase our understanding of individual actors as contributors to leadership and development of tourism destinations. Design/methodology/approach - An intrinsic case study of a Finnish ski resort, Ruka, is presented. The primary data consist of 16 narrative interviews. Secondary sources of information such as a history book and a historical review, reports and Web pages have been used as well. Findings - The study suggests that the leadership in a destination is attributed to individuals. It is the charismatic entrepreneurs, business managers, municipality and influential politicians that may take control of the leadership at the destination. Being local enhances the sense of identity with the place and facilitates a cooperative atmosphere between actors. Finally, the roles of stakeholders and aspects of the leadership of a destination may vary along the destination life cycle. Research limitations/implications - As this paper presents a single case study in a Finnish context, the findings cannot be, and are not meant to be, generalized. Rather, the findings present an example of an exception to the mainstream destination management and governance literature. Originality/value - The paper fills the research gap noted by Kennedy (2014) and presents an in-depth study analysing the role of different stakeholders in destination leadership.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 76
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   The importance of being local: prioritizing knowledge in recruitment for destination development [J].
Aberg, Kajsa G. .
TOURISM REVIEW, 2014, 69 (03) :229-243
[2]   Opportunities and institutions: A co-creation story of the king crab industry [J].
Alvarez, Sharon A. ;
Young, Susan L. ;
Woolley, Jennifer L. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2015, 30 (01) :95-112
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, COMPETITIVE DESTINAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J TRAVEL RES, DOI DOI 10.1177/0047287507302385
[5]   From destination governance to destination leadership - defining and exploring the significance with the help of a systemic perspective [J].
Beritelli, Pietro ;
Bieger, Thomas .
TOURISM REVIEW, 2014, 69 (01) :25-46
[6]   A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews [J].
Boeije, H .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2002, 36 (04) :391-409
[7]   COORDINATING RELATIONSHIPS AMONG DESTINATION STAKEHOLDERS: EVIDENCE FROM EDINBURGH (UK) [J].
Bregoli, Ilenia ;
Del Chiapa, Giacomo .
TOURISM ANALYSIS, 2013, 18 (02) :145-155
[8]  
Chase S.E., 2000, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, V2nd, P651
[9]   DETERMINANTS OF COOPERATION IN A TOURIST REGION [J].
Czernek, Katarzyna .
ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2013, 40 :83-104
[10]  
Eriksson P., 2011, QUALITATIVE METHODS