Reassessing science communication for effective farmland biodiversity conservation

被引:4
作者
Velado-Alonso, Elena [1 ,2 ]
Kleijn, David [3 ]
Bartomeus, Ignasi [1 ]
机构
[1] Estn Biol Donana EBD CSIC, Ecol & Evolut Dept, Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Crop Sci, Funct Agrobiodivers & Agroecol Grp, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Wageningen Univ, Plant Ecol & Nat Conservat Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
FOOD; AGRICULTURE; MANAGEMENT; NARRATIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.tree.2024.01.007
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Integrating biodiversity conservation into agriculture is a pressing challenge promoted by conservationists. Although biodiversity can also provide important benefits to farmers, the adoption of biodiversity-enhancing measures is lagging behind the scientific evidence. This may partially be related to the way scientists position themselves. If scientists do not convincingly communicate about the implications of their evidence, other interested stakeholders will drive the conversations. To increase societal impact, scientists must understand the complex communication environment and take an informed and strategic position. We describe the prevailing conservation and farming narratives, highlighting how the term 'biodiversity' can be used to start dialogues between parties with conflicting demands and exemplifying how scientists can build effective narratives.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 547
页数:11
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [71] The fantasmatic narrative of 'sustainable development'. A political analysis of the 2030 Global Development Agenda
    Telleria, Juan
    Garcia-Arias, Jorge
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2022, 40 (01) : 241 - 259
  • [72] Why facts don't change minds: Insights from cognitive science for the improved communication of conservation research
    Toomey, Anne H.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2023, 278
  • [73] Delivering behavioural change at scale: What conservation can learn from other fields
    Travers, Henry
    Walsh, James
    Vogt, Sonja
    Clements, Tom
    Milner-Gulland, E. J.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 257
  • [74] Is Emile in the Garden of Eden? Western ideologies of nature
    Tulloch, Lynley
    [J]. POLICY FUTURES IN EDUCATION, 2015, 13 (01): : 20 - 41
  • [75] United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, 2022, CBD/ COP/15/L25: Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework
  • [76] United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, 2016, P 13 M C PART CONV B
  • [77] United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2019, FAO STRAT MAINSTR BI
  • [78] Enhancement of farmland biodiversity within set-aside land
    Van Buskirk, J
    Willi, Y
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (04) : 987 - 994
  • [79] van der Ploeg J.D., 2018, NEW PEASANTRIES RURA, V2nd
  • [80] Transformation of agricultural landscapes in the Anthropocene: Nature's contributions to people, agriculture and food security
    Vanbergen, Adam J.
    Aizen, Marcelo A.
    Cordeau, Stephane
    Garibaldi, Lucas A.
    Garratt, Michael P. D.
    Kovacs-Hostyanszki, Aniko
    Lecuyer, Lou
    Ngo, Hien T.
    Potts, Simon G.
    Settele, Josef
    Skrimizea, Eirini
    Young, Juliette C.
    [J]. FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES, PT I, 2020, 63 : 193 - 253