Radiographic Study of Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Using Osseodensification Technique with Graft Material: A Pilot Study

被引:3
|
作者
Sulyhan-Sulyhan, Khrystyna [1 ]
Barbera-Millan, Javier [1 ,2 ]
Larrazabal-Moron, Carolina [1 ]
Espinosa-Gimenez, Julian [1 ]
Gomez-Adrian, Maria Dolores [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Valencia San Vicente Martir, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dent Dept, Valencia 46001, Spain
[2] Catholic Univ Valencia San Vicente Martir, Doctoral Sch, Valencia 46001, Spain
关键词
atrophic maxilla; sinus augmentation; bone regeneration; dental implant; maxillary sinus; minimally invasive; surgical procedure; bone substitutes; MAXILLARY SINUS; POSTERIOR MAXILLA; IMPLANT PLACEMENT; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BONE-DENSITY; AUGMENTATION; COMPLICATIONS; STABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/biomimetics9050276
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This pilot study aimed to evaluate the level of implant success after transcrestal sinus floor elevation (tSFE) using the osseodensification technique (OD) combined with beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) by analyzing clinical and radiographic results. Moreover, the increase in bone height was analyzed immediately after surgery, 3 months after, and before loading by taking standardized radiographic measurements. Thirteen patients, four males and nine females, with a mean age of 54.69 +/- 5.86 years, requiring the placement of one implant in the upper posterior maxilla, with a residual bone height of <8 mm and a minimum bone width of 5 mm, participated in the study. The bone gain data was obtained using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) immediately after surgery and twelve months after the placement. The correlation between initial and final bone height with implant stability was also assessed. The results were analyzed using SPSS 23 software (p < 0.05). The results of the study indicated a 100% implant success rate after a follow-up period of twelve months. Preoperative main bone height was 5.70 +/- 0.95 mm. The osseodensification technique allowed a significant increase of 6.65 +/- 1.06 mm immediately after surgery. After a twelve-month follow-up, a graft material contraction of 0.90 +/- 0.49 mm was observed. No correlation was observed between the bone height at the different times of the study and the primary stability of the implant. Considering the limitations of the size sample of this study, the osseodensification technique used for transcrestal sinus lift with the additional bone graft material (beta-TCP) may provide a predictable elevation of the maxillary sinus floor, allowing simultaneous implant insertion with adequate stability irrespective of bone height limitations.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bone-Added Osteotome Technique Versus Lateral Approach for Sinus Floor Elevation: A Comparative Radiographic Study
    Kim, Sung-Mi
    Park, Jin-Woo
    Suh, Jo-Young
    Sohn, Dong-Seok
    Lee, Jae-Mok
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2011, 20 (06) : 465 - 470
  • [32] Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute
    Pommer, Bernhard
    Unger, Ewald
    Busenlechner, Dieter
    Haas, Robert
    Mailath-Pokorny, Georg
    Fuerhauser, Rudolf
    Watzek, Georg
    MATERIALS, 2015, 8 (06): : 3210 - 3220
  • [33] Patient-specific estimation of the bone graft volume needed for maxillary sinus floor elevation: a radiographic study using cone-beam computed tomography
    Hung, Kuo Feng
    Hui, Liu Ling
    Leung, Yiu Yan
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (05) : 3875 - 3884
  • [34] The impact of graft remodeling on peri-implant bone support at implants placed concomitantly with transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A multicenter, retrospective case series
    Franceschetti, Giovanni
    Farina, Roberto
    Minenna, Luigi
    Riccardi, Orio
    Stacchi, Claudio
    Di Raimondo, Rosario
    Maietti, Elisa
    Trombelli, Leonardo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (02) : 105 - 120
  • [35] Osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without grafting material: 3-year results of a prospective pilot study
    Nedir, Rabah
    Bischof, Mark
    Vazquez, Lydia
    Nurdin, Nathalie
    Szmukler-Moncler, Serge
    Bernard, Jean-Pierre
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (07) : 701 - 707
  • [36] Schneiderian membrane perforation via transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A randomized ex vivo study with endoscopic validation
    Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi
    Tattan, Mustafa
    Sinjab, Khaled H.
    Chan, Hsun-Liang
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [37] Trephine Core Procedure Versus Bone-Added Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in the Augmentation of the Sinus Floor: A Comparative Clinical and Radiographic Study
    Chandra, Rampalli Viswa
    Suvvari, Neeraja
    Reddy, Aileni Amarender
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (02) : 425 - 432
  • [38] A minimally invasive technique for lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation: a Bayesian network study
    Merli, Mauro
    Moscatelli, Marco
    Mariotti, Giorgia
    Pagliaro, Umberto
    Bernardelli, Francesco
    Nieri, Michele
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (03) : 273 - 281
  • [39] Mini-invasive Implant Placement in Combination with Maxillary Sinus Membrane Perforation During Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation: A Retrospective Study
    Toscano, Paolo
    Toscano, Calogero
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 36 (02) : 199 - 211
  • [40] Clinical and radiographic outcomes following transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenous bone substitute in gel form: a prospective multicenter study
    Lombardi, Teresa
    Lamazza, Luca
    Bernardello, Fabio
    Zietek, Grzegorz
    Stacchi, Claudio
    Troiano, Giuseppe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2022, 8 (01)