Assessment of Commercial GNSS Radio Occultation Performance from PlanetiQ Mission

被引:3
作者
Zhran, Mohamed [1 ]
Mousa, Ashraf [2 ]
Wang, Yu [3 ,4 ]
Ben Hasher, Fahdah Falah [5 ]
Jin, Shuanggen [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Engn, Publ Works Engn Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
[2] Natl Res Inst Astron & Geophys, Geodynam Dept, Helwan 11421, Egypt
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Astron Observ, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Astron & Space Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[5] Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman Univ, Coll Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Geog & Environm Sustainabil, POB 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
[6] Henan Polytech Univ, Sch Surveying & Land Informat Engn, Jiaozuo 454003, Peoples R China
关键词
radio occultation; GNSS; refractivity; signal-to-noise ratio; PlanetiQ; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.3390/rs16173339
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio occultation (RO) provides valuable 3-D atmospheric profiles with all-weather, all the time and high accuracy. However, GNSS RO mission data are still limited for global coverage. Currently, more commercial GNSS radio occultation missions are being launched, e.g., PlanetiQ. In this study, we examine the commercial GNSS RO PlanetiQ mission performance in comparison to KOMPSAT-5 and PAZ, including the coverage, SNR, and penetration depth. Additionally, the quality of PlanetiQ RO refractivity profiles is assessed by comparing with the fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5) data in October 2023. Our results ensure that the capability of PlanetiQ to track signals from any GNSS satellite is larger than the ability of KOMPSAT-5 and PAZ. The mean L1 SNR for PlanetiQ is significantly larger than that of KOMPSAT-5 and PAZ. Thus, PlanetiQ performs better in sounding the deeper troposphere. Furthermore, PlanetiQ's average penetration height ranges from 0.16 to 0.49 km in all latitudinal bands over water. Generally, the refractivity profiles from all three missions exhibit a small bias when compared to ERA5-derived refractivity and typically remain below 1% above 800 hPa.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Inverting COSMIC-2 Phase Data to Bending Angle and Refractivity Profiles Using the Full Spectrum Inversion Method [J].
Adhikari, Loknath ;
Ho, Shu-Peng ;
Zhou, Xinjia .
REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (09)
[2]  
[Anonymous], About us
[3]  
[Anonymous], about us
[4]   Exploring Earth's atmosphere with radio occultation: contributions to weather, climate and space weather [J].
Anthes, R. A. .
ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2011, 4 (06) :1077-1103
[5]   Comparison of COSMIC and COSMIC-2 Radio Occultation Refractivity and Bending Angle Uncertainties in August 2006 and 2021 [J].
Anthes, Richard ;
Sjoberg, Jeremiah ;
Feng, Xuelei ;
Syndergaard, Stig .
ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (05)
[6]   Lower troposphere refractivity bias in GPS occultation retrievals [J].
Ao, CO ;
Meehan, TK ;
Hajj, GA ;
Mannucci, AJ ;
Beyerle, G .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D18)
[7]   Applications of GNSS-RO to Numerical Weather Prediction and Tropical Cyclone Forecast [J].
Bai, Weihua ;
Deng, Nan ;
Sun, Yueqiang ;
Du, Qifei ;
Xia, Junming ;
Wang, Xianyi ;
Meng, Xiangguang ;
Zhao, Danyang ;
Liu, Congliang ;
Tan, Guangyuan ;
Liu, Ziyan ;
Liu, Xiaoxu .
ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (11)
[8]   GNSS Radio Occultation Constellation Observing System Experiments [J].
Bauer, Peter ;
Radnoti, Gabor ;
Healy, Sean ;
Cardinali, Carla .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2014, 142 (02) :555-572
[9]  
Bowler N.E., 2020, ROM SAF Report 36
[10]   Simultaneous Radio Occultation or Intersatellite Comparison of Bending Angles toward More Accurate Atmospheric Sounding [J].
Cao, Changyong ;
Wang, Wenhui ;
Lynch, Erin ;
Bai, Yan ;
Ho, Shu-peng ;
Zhang, Bin .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 37 (12) :2307-2320