MU variability in CBCT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Tanny, Sean [1 ,3 ]
Dona Lemus, Olga M. [1 ]
Wancura, Joshua [1 ]
Sperling, Nicholas [2 ]
Webster, Matthew [1 ]
Jung, Hyunuk [1 ]
Zhou, Yuwei [1 ]
Li, Fiona [1 ]
Yoon, Jihyung [1 ]
Podgorsak, Alexander [1 ]
Zheng, Dandan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toledo, OH USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Wilmot Canc Inst, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 09期
关键词
adaptive radiotherapy; CBCT-based adaptive RT; ethos-based adaptive; MU variability; patient specific QA; plan QA; APERTURE COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14440
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeCBCT-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (oART) systems have been made possible by using artificial intelligence and automation to substantially reduce treatment planning time during on-couch adaptive sessions. Evaluating plans generated during an adaptive session presents significant challenges to the clinical team as the planning process gets compressed into a shorter window than offline planning. We identified MU variations up to 30% difference between the adaptive plan and the reference plan in several oART sessions that caused the clinical team to question the accuracy of the oART dose calculation. We investigated the cause of MU variation and the overall accuracy of the dose delivered when MU variations appear unnecessarily large.MethodsDosimetric and adaptive plan data from 604 adaptive sessions of 19 patients undergoing CBCT-guided oART were collected. The analysis included total MU per fraction, planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) volumes, changes in PTV-OAR overlap, and DVH curves. Sessions with MU greater than two standard deviations from the mean were reoptimized offline, verified by an independent calculation system, and measured using a detector array.ResultsMU variations relative to the reference plan were normally distributed with a mean of -1.0% and a standard deviation of 11.0%. No significant correlation was found between MU variation and anatomic changes. Offline reoptimization did not reliably reproduce either reference or on-couch total MUs, suggesting that stochastic effects within the oART optimizer are likely causing the variations. Independent dose calculation and detector array measurements resulted in acceptable agreement with the planned dose.ConclusionsMU variations observed between oART plans were not caused by any errors within the oART workflow. Providers should refrain from using MU variability as a way to express their confidence in the treatment planning accuracy. Clinical decisions during on-couch adaptive sessions should rely on validated secondary dose calculations to ensure optimal plan selection.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Characterization of Ethos therapy systems for adaptive radiation therapy: A multi-machine comparison
    van de Schoot, Agustinus J.
    Hoffmans, Daan
    van Ingen, Karel M.
    Simons, Martijn J.
    Wiersma, Jan
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (05):
  • [42] Plan of the day selection for online image-guided adaptive post-prostatectomy radiotherapy
    Gill, Suki
    Pham, Daniel
    Dang, Kim
    Bressel, Mathias
    Kron, Tomas
    Siva, Shankar
    Tran, Phillip K.
    Tai, Keen Hun
    Foroudi, Farshad
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 107 (02) : 165 - 170
  • [43] Proton Beam Therapy and Photon-Based Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: The Next Frontiers of Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Zaki, Peter
    Chuong, Michael D.
    Schaub, Stephanie K.
    Lo, Simon S.
    Ibrahim, Mariam
    Apisarnthanarax, Smith
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2023, 22
  • [44] Proton Beam Therapy and Photon-Based Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: The Next Frontiers of Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Zaki, Peter
    Chuong, Michael D.
    Schaub, Stephanie K.
    Lo, Simon S.
    Ibrahim, Mariam
    Apisarnthanarax, Smith
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2023, 22
  • [45] Cost of prostate image-guided radiation therapy: Results of a randomized trial
    Perrier, Lionel
    Morelle, Magali
    Pommier, Pascal
    Lagrange, Jean-Leon
    Laplanche, Agnes
    Dudouet, Philippe
    Supiot, Stephane
    Chauvet, Bruno
    Tan-Dat Nguyen
    Crehange, Gilles
    Beckendorf, Veronique
    Pene, Francoise
    Muracciole, Xavier
    Bachaud, Jean-Marc
    Le Prise, Elisabeth
    de Crevoisier, Renaud
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 106 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [46] Image-guided radiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer
    Thariat, Juliette
    Aluwini, Shafak
    Pan, Qiong
    Caullery, Mickael
    Marcy, Pierre-Yves
    Housset, Martin
    Lagrange, Jean-Leon
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2012, 9 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [47] MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: The Next Frontier in Ultrahypofractionation
    Benitez, Cecil M.
    Steinberg, Michael L.
    Cao, Minsong
    Qi, X. Sharon
    Lamb, James M.
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Valle, Luca F.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [48] Initial analysis of the dosimetric benefit and clinical resource cost of CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy for patients with cancers of the cervix or rectum
    Yock, Adam D.
    Ahmed, Mahmoud
    Ayala-Peacock, Diandra
    Chakravarthy, A. Bapsi
    Price, Michael
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (10): : 210 - 221
  • [49] Evaluation of knowledge-based planning models for male pelvic CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy on conventional linear accelerators
    Tegtmeier, Riley C.
    Clouser, Edward L.
    Laughlin, Brady S.
    Toesca, Diego A. Santos
    Flakus, Mattison J.
    Bashir, Sara
    Kutyreff, Christopher J.
    Hobbis, Dean
    Harrington, Daniel P.
    Smetanick, Jennifer L.
    Yu, Nathan Y.
    Vargas, Carlos E.
    James, Sarah E.
    Rwigema, Jean-Claude M.
    Rong, Yi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (09):
  • [50] Adaptive radiation therapy: When, how and what are the benefits that literature provides?
    Avgousti, R.
    Antypas, C.
    Armpilia, C.
    Simopoulou, F.
    Karaiskos, P.
    Liakouli, Z.
    Kouloulias, V.
    Kyrodimos, E.
    Moulopoulos, L. A.
    Zygogianni, A.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2022, 26 (04): : 622 - 636