MU variability in CBCT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Tanny, Sean [1 ,3 ]
Dona Lemus, Olga M. [1 ]
Wancura, Joshua [1 ]
Sperling, Nicholas [2 ]
Webster, Matthew [1 ]
Jung, Hyunuk [1 ]
Zhou, Yuwei [1 ]
Li, Fiona [1 ]
Yoon, Jihyung [1 ]
Podgorsak, Alexander [1 ]
Zheng, Dandan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toledo, OH USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Wilmot Canc Inst, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 09期
关键词
adaptive radiotherapy; CBCT-based adaptive RT; ethos-based adaptive; MU variability; patient specific QA; plan QA; APERTURE COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14440
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeCBCT-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (oART) systems have been made possible by using artificial intelligence and automation to substantially reduce treatment planning time during on-couch adaptive sessions. Evaluating plans generated during an adaptive session presents significant challenges to the clinical team as the planning process gets compressed into a shorter window than offline planning. We identified MU variations up to 30% difference between the adaptive plan and the reference plan in several oART sessions that caused the clinical team to question the accuracy of the oART dose calculation. We investigated the cause of MU variation and the overall accuracy of the dose delivered when MU variations appear unnecessarily large.MethodsDosimetric and adaptive plan data from 604 adaptive sessions of 19 patients undergoing CBCT-guided oART were collected. The analysis included total MU per fraction, planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) volumes, changes in PTV-OAR overlap, and DVH curves. Sessions with MU greater than two standard deviations from the mean were reoptimized offline, verified by an independent calculation system, and measured using a detector array.ResultsMU variations relative to the reference plan were normally distributed with a mean of -1.0% and a standard deviation of 11.0%. No significant correlation was found between MU variation and anatomic changes. Offline reoptimization did not reliably reproduce either reference or on-couch total MUs, suggesting that stochastic effects within the oART optimizer are likely causing the variations. Independent dose calculation and detector array measurements resulted in acceptable agreement with the planned dose.ConclusionsMU variations observed between oART plans were not caused by any errors within the oART workflow. Providers should refrain from using MU variability as a way to express their confidence in the treatment planning accuracy. Clinical decisions during on-couch adaptive sessions should rely on validated secondary dose calculations to ensure optimal plan selection.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radiomics-guided radiation therapy: opportunities and challenges
    Abdollahi, Hamid
    Chin, Erika
    Clark, Haley
    Hyde, Derek E.
    Thomas, Steven
    Wu, Jonn
    Uribe, Carlos F.
    Rahmim, Arman
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (12):
  • [22] Image guided adaptive external beam radiation therapy for cervix cancer: Evaluation of a clinically implemented plan-of-the-day technique
    Buschmann, Martin
    Majercakova, Katarina
    Sturdza, Alina
    Smet, Stephanie
    Najjari, Dina
    Daniel, Michaela
    Poetter, Richard
    Georg, Dietmar
    Seppenwoolde, Yvette
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2018, 28 (03): : 184 - 195
  • [23] MRI-guided Pelvic Radiation Therapy: A Primer for Radiologists
    Zhong, Jim
    Kobus, Marta
    Maitre, Priyamvada
    Datta, Anubhav
    Eccles, Cynthia
    Dubec, Michael
    Mchugh, Damien
    Buckley, David
    Scarsbrook, Andrew
    Hoskin, Peter
    Henry, Ann
    Choudhury, Ananya
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2023, 43 (11)
  • [24] Intrafraction Motion Management With MR-Guided Radiation Therapy
    Fast, Martin F.
    Cao, Minsong
    Parikh, Parag
    Sonke, Jan-Jakob
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 92 - 106
  • [25] Dosimetric comparison of autocontouring techniques for online adaptive proton therapy
    Smolders, A.
    Choulilitsa, E.
    Czerska, K.
    Bizzocchi, N.
    Krcek, R.
    Lomax, A.
    Weber, D. C.
    Albertini, F.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (17):
  • [26] Commissioning of an Adaptive Radiation Therapy module for Tomotherapy treatments
    Mateus, Josefina
    Girao, Mariana
    Capela, Miguel
    Santos, Tania
    Ventura, Tiago
    Lopes, Maria do Carmo
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4086 - S4088
  • [27] Faculty of Radiation Oncology Position Paper on the use of Image-Guided Radiation Therapy
    Tiong, Albert
    Lao, Louis
    MacKean, James
    Goonetilleke, Madhavi
    Kron, Tomas
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 60 (06) : 772 - 780
  • [28] Developing an adaptive radiation therapy strategy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Fung, Winky Wing Ki
    Wu, Vincent Wing Cheung
    Teo, Peter Man Lung
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2014, 55 (02) : 293 - 304
  • [29] Channel-Spatial Attention Guided CycleGAN for CBCT-Based Synthetic CT Generation to Enable Adaptive Radiotherapy
    Liu, Yangchuan
    Liao, Shimin
    Zhu, Yechen
    Deng, Fuxing
    Zhang, Zijian
    Gao, Xin
    Cheng, Tingting
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL IMAGING, 2024, 10 : 818 - 831
  • [30] Image-guided adaptive radiotherapy improves acute toxicity during intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer
    Chen, Allen M.
    Yoshizaki, Taeko
    Hsu, Sophia
    Mikaeilian, Argin
    Cao, Minsong
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7 (02) : 139 - 145