MU variability in CBCT-guided online adaptive radiation therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Tanny, Sean [1 ,3 ]
Dona Lemus, Olga M. [1 ]
Wancura, Joshua [1 ]
Sperling, Nicholas [2 ]
Webster, Matthew [1 ]
Jung, Hyunuk [1 ]
Zhou, Yuwei [1 ]
Li, Fiona [1 ]
Yoon, Jihyung [1 ]
Podgorsak, Alexander [1 ]
Zheng, Dandan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toledo, OH USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Wilmot Canc Inst, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 09期
关键词
adaptive radiotherapy; CBCT-based adaptive RT; ethos-based adaptive; MU variability; patient specific QA; plan QA; APERTURE COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14440
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeCBCT-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (oART) systems have been made possible by using artificial intelligence and automation to substantially reduce treatment planning time during on-couch adaptive sessions. Evaluating plans generated during an adaptive session presents significant challenges to the clinical team as the planning process gets compressed into a shorter window than offline planning. We identified MU variations up to 30% difference between the adaptive plan and the reference plan in several oART sessions that caused the clinical team to question the accuracy of the oART dose calculation. We investigated the cause of MU variation and the overall accuracy of the dose delivered when MU variations appear unnecessarily large.MethodsDosimetric and adaptive plan data from 604 adaptive sessions of 19 patients undergoing CBCT-guided oART were collected. The analysis included total MU per fraction, planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) volumes, changes in PTV-OAR overlap, and DVH curves. Sessions with MU greater than two standard deviations from the mean were reoptimized offline, verified by an independent calculation system, and measured using a detector array.ResultsMU variations relative to the reference plan were normally distributed with a mean of -1.0% and a standard deviation of 11.0%. No significant correlation was found between MU variation and anatomic changes. Offline reoptimization did not reliably reproduce either reference or on-couch total MUs, suggesting that stochastic effects within the oART optimizer are likely causing the variations. Independent dose calculation and detector array measurements resulted in acceptable agreement with the planned dose.ConclusionsMU variations observed between oART plans were not caused by any errors within the oART workflow. Providers should refrain from using MU variability as a way to express their confidence in the treatment planning accuracy. Clinical decisions during on-couch adaptive sessions should rely on validated secondary dose calculations to ensure optimal plan selection.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficient segmentation using domain adaptation for MRI-guided and CBCT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy
    Liu, Yuxiang
    Yang, Bining
    Chen, Xinyuan
    Zhu, Ji
    Ji, Guangqian
    Liu, Yueping
    Chen, Bo
    Lu, Ningning
    Yi, Junlin
    Wang, Shulian
    Li, Yexiong
    Dai, Jianrong
    Men, Kuo
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 188
  • [2] Evaluating CBCT-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer Using Synthetic CBCT Data
    Olberg, Sven
    Thompson, Leah L.
    Roberts, Hannah J.
    Wo, Jennifer Y.
    Hong, Theodore S.
    Wolfgang, John
    Grassberger, Clemens
    Pursley, Jennifer
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2025, 32 (02)
  • [3] Rapid unpaired CBCT-based synthetic CT for CBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Wynne, Jacob F.
    Lei, Yang
    Pan, Shaoyan
    Wang, Tonghe
    Pasha, Mosa
    Luca, Kirk
    Roper, Justin
    Patel, Pretesh
    Patel, Sagar A.
    Godette, Karen
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (10):
  • [4] Empirical analysis of a plan-of-the-day strategy to approximate daily online reoptimization for prostate CBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Yock, Adam D.
    Cooney, Annie
    Morales-Paliza, Manuel
    Shinohara, Eric
    Homann, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [5] CBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy using self-supervised sequential domain adaptation with uncertainty estimation
    Ebadi, Nima
    Li, Ruiqi
    Das, Arun
    Roy, Arkajyoti
    Nikos, Papanikolaou
    Najafirad, Peyman
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2023, 86
  • [6] Inter-fraction deformable image registration using unsupervised deep learning for CBCT-guided abdominal radiotherapy
    Xie, Huiqiao
    Lei, Yang
    Fu, Yabo
    Wang, Tonghe
    Roper, Justin
    Bradley, Jeffrey D.
    Patel, Pretesh
    Liu, Tian
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (09):
  • [7] Daily online adaptive magnetic resonance image (MRI) guided stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary renal cell cancer
    Kutuk, Tugce
    McCulloch, James
    Mittauer, Kathryn E.
    Romaguera, Tino
    Alvarez, Diane
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Chuong, Michael
    Kotecha, Rupesh
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (03) : 289 - 294
  • [8] Robust optimization strategies for contour uncertainties in online adaptive radiation therapy
    Smolders, A.
    Bengtsson, I
    Forsgren, A.
    Lomax, A.
    Weber, D. C.
    Fredriksson, A.
    Albertini, F.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (16):
  • [9] Robustness and reproducibility of an artificial intelligence-assisted online segmentation and adaptive planning process for online adaptive radiation therapy
    Chapman, John W.
    Lam, Dao
    Cai, Bin
    Hugo, Geoffrey D.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (08):
  • [10] Pan-Canadian assessment of image guided adaptive radiation therapy and the role of the radiation therapist
    Moreira, Amanda
    Rosewall, Tara
    Tsang, Yat
    Lindsay, Patricia
    Chung, Peter
    Li, Winnie
    TECHNICAL INNOVATIONS & PATIENT SUPPORT IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 33