Can Artificial Intelligence Engage in the Practice of Law as the Art of Good and Justice?

被引:0
作者
Gaubiene, Neringa [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Univ, Fac Law, Sauletekio Ave 9,Block 1, LT-10222 Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
FILOSOFIJA-SOCIOLOGIJA | 2024年 / 35卷 / 02期
关键词
artificial intelligence; good and justice; ethics; law as an art; pursuit of justice;
D O I
10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2Priedas.Special-Issue.4
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This article explores whether artificial intelligence (AI) can engage in the practice of law as an art of good and justice. It examines the historical and philosophical foundations of law as the art of promoting societal harmony and resolving moral dilemmas. The research employs critical and philosophical analysis methods integrating insights from legal scholars, ethicists, technologists, and policymakers. The study identifies AI's potential to streamline legal processes, enhance access to justice, and reduce bias in decision -making. However, it also highlights ethical challenges such as transparency, accountability, and the impact on the legal workforce. The article emphasises the importance of striking a balance between technological innovation and human values, advocating for proactive regulation and interdisciplinary cooperation to ensure the ethical development and implementation of AI in law. The results of the study highlight the transformative potential of AI in revolutionising legal practice, emphasising its capacity to streamline processes, improve access to justice, and mitigate bias. However, ethical considerations such as transparency, accountability, and the preservation of human judgment are crucial to ensuring that AI integration in law upholds funda
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 63
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Aquinas T., 1988, LAW MORALITY POLITIC, P226
[2]  
Bathaee Y., 2017, Harv J L & T ech, V31, P889, DOI DOI 10.1177/0038038516645751
[3]  
Bell Felicity, 2022, AI Decision-Making and the Courts: A Guide for Judges, Tribunal Members and Court Administrators
[4]   Introduction to the special issue on Artificial Intelligence for Justice (AI4J) [J].
Bex, Floris ;
Prakken, Henry ;
van Engers, Tom ;
Verheij, Bart .
Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2017, 25 (01) :1-3
[5]  
Butenko A., 2015, Law, Innovation and Technology, V7, P52, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2015.1052643, DOI 10.1080/17579961.2015.1052643]
[6]  
Campbell RayWorthy., 2020, Colorado Technology Law Journal, V18, P323
[7]  
Casey A. J., 2020, A First Look at the Algorithmic Replication of Prior Cases, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3633037, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3633037]
[8]  
Davis JP., 2019, Oklahoma Law Review, V72, P51
[9]  
European Parliament Briefing, 2019, Artificial Intelligence Ante Portas: Legal & Ethical Reflections
[10]  
Fenwick Mark D, 2017, American University Business Law Rev, V6, P561