Effectiveness of care bundles for prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review

被引:15
作者
Vogel, Joshua P. [1 ,2 ]
Nguyen, Phi-Yen [1 ,2 ]
Ramson, Jen [1 ]
De Silva, Manarangi S. [3 ,4 ]
Pham, Minh D. [1 ,2 ]
Sultana, Saima [1 ,2 ]
McDonald, Steve [2 ]
Adu-Bonsaffoh, Kwame [5 ]
McDougall, Annie R. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Burnet Inst, Maternal Child & Adolescent Hlth Program, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Mercy Hosp Women, Mercy Perinatal, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Ghana, Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Accra, Ghana
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
care bundles; complex interventions; evidence synthesis; maternal health; maternal morbidity; maternal mortality; maternal outcomes; obstetric complications; postpartum haemorrhage; systematic reviews; SAFETY CONSENSUS-BUNDLE; NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP; MANAGEMENT; REDUCE; INFECTIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2024.01.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Care bundles are a promising approach to reducing postpartum hemorrhage-related morbidity and mortality. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of care bundles for postpartum hemorrhage prevention and/or treatment. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Maternity and Infant Care Database, and Global Index Medicus (inception to June 9, 2023) and ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (last 5 years) using a phased search strategy, combining terms for postpartum hemorrhage and care bundles. Study Eligibility Criteria: Peer-reviewed studies evaluating postpartum hemorrhage-related care bundles were included. Care bundles were defined as interventions comprising >= 3 components implemented collectively, concurrently, or in rapid succession. Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, interrupted time series, and before-after studies (controlled or uncontrolled) were eligible. Methods: Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 (randomized trials) and ROBINS-I (nonrandomized studies). For controlled studies, we reported risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes, with certainty of evidence determined using GRADE. For uncontrolled studies, we used effect direction tables and summarized results narratively. Results: Twenty-two studies were included for analysis. For prevention-only bundles (2 studies), low-certainty evidence suggests possible benefits in reducing blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and intensive care unit stay, and maternal well-being. For treatment-only bundles (9 studies), high-certainty evidence shows that the E-MOTIVE intervention reduced risks of composite severe morbidity (risk ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.50) and blood transfusion for bleeding, postpartum hemorrhage, severe postpartum hemorrhage, and mean blood loss. One nonrandomized trial and 7 uncontrolled studies suggest that other postpartum hemorrhage treatment bundles might reduce blood loss and severe postpartum hemorrhage, but this is uncertain. For combined prevention/treatment bundles (11 studies), low-certainty evidence shows that the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative care bundle may reduce severe maternal morbidity (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.72). Ten uncontrolled studies variably showed possible benefits, no effects, or harms for other bundle types. Nearly all uncontrolled studies did not use suitable statistical methods for single-group pretest-posttest comparisons and should thus be interpreted with caution. Conclusion: The E-MOTIVE intervention improves postpartum hemorrhage-related outcomes among women delivering vaginally, and the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative bundle may reduce severe maternal morbidity. Other bundle designs warrant further effectiveness research before implementation is contemplated.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 91
页数:25
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Postpartum hemorrhage care bundles to improve adherence to guidelines: A WHO technical consultation [J].
Althabe, Fernando ;
Therrien, Michelle N. S. ;
Pingray, Veronica ;
Hermida, Jorge ;
Guelmezoglu, Ahmet M. ;
Armbruster, Deborah ;
Singh, Neelima ;
Guha, Moytrayee ;
Garg, Lorraine F. ;
Souza, Joao P. ;
Smith, Jeffrey M. ;
Winikoff, Beverly ;
Thapa, Kusum ;
Hebert, Emmanuelle ;
Liljestrand, Jerker ;
Downe, Soo ;
Elorrio, Ezequiel Garcia ;
Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam ;
Byaruhanga, Emmanuel K. ;
Lissauer, David M. ;
Ogutu, Monica ;
Dumont, Alexandre ;
Escobar, Maria F. ;
Fuchtner, Carlos ;
Lumbiganon, Pisake ;
Burke, Thomas F. ;
Miller, Suellen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2020, 148 (03) :290-299
[2]  
Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, 2017, Obstet Gynecol, V130, pe168, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0000000000002398, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002351]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2023, WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage
[5]  
[Anonymous], Management of the Third Stage of Labour to prevent Post-partum Haemorrhage 2007 [cited 2013]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Maternal health e Global Burden of Disease 2019
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2020, WHO recommendation on routes of oxytocin administration for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2023, WHO announces the first meeting of the postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) bundle Guideline Development Subgroup
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2021, WHO recommendation on Uterine balloon tamponade for the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SPSP maternity and children: end of phase report 2016