Radiation protection in CT-guided interventions: does real-time dose visualisation lead to a reduction in radiation dose to participating radiologists? A single-centre evaluation

被引:2
|
作者
Koch, A. [1 ]
Gruber-Rouh, T. [1 ]
Zangos, S. [1 ]
Eichler, K. [1 ]
Vogl, T. [1 ]
Basten, L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Frankfurt Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Theodor Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Theodor Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
DOSIMETRY SYSTEM; FLUOROSCOPY; EXPOSURE; SAFETY; BIOPSY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2024.01.028
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate if real-time dose visualisation during computed tomography (CT)-guided interventions leads to a reduction in radiation dose to participating radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The individual radiation dose radiologists are exposed to during CT interventions was measured using dedicated dosimeters (RaySafe i2-system, Unfors RaySafe GmbH, Billdal, Sweden) worn over the usual radiation protective apron. Initially, only the total radiation dose was measured, without visualisation (control group). In the following study period, the radiation dose was shown to participants on a live screen in real-time (experimental group). In both groups, the dose was recorded in 1-second intervals. The results collected were evaluated by comparison using descriptive statistics and mixed-effect models. In particular, the variables experience, gender, role, and position during the intervention were analysed. RESULTS: In total, 517 measurements of 304 interventions (n=249 with and n=268 without live screen) performed by 29 radiologists acting as interventionalists or assistants were analysed. All CT-guided interventions were performed percutaneously, the majority of which (n=280) were microwave ablations (MWA). Radiation doses in the group without visualisation were comparable with usual dose rates for the corresponding intervention type. The mean total radiation dose was reduced by 58.1% (11.6 versus 4.86 mu Sv) in the experimental group (p=0.034). The highest reduction of 78.5% (15.55 versus 3.35 mu Sv) was observed in radiologists with the role of assistant (p=0.002). Sub-analysis showed significant dose reduction (p<0.0001) for the use of live screen in general; considering all variables, the role "assistant" alone had a statistically significant influence (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The real-time visualisation of active radiation dose during CT interventions leads to a relevant reduction in radiation dose to participating radiologists. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:e785 / e790
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] PET/CT-guided Interventions: Personnel Radiation Dose
    Ryan, E. Ronan
    Thornton, Raymond
    Sofocleous, Constantinos T.
    Erinjeri, Joseph P.
    Hsu, Meier
    Quinn, Brian
    Dauer, Lawrence T.
    Solomon, Stephen B.
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (04) : 1063 - 1067
  • [2] Evaluation of a Leaden Radiation Protection Barrier for Dose Reduction for the Physician during CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventions
    Haipt, F.
    Kirsch, M.
    Hosten, N.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2010, 182 (06): : 512 - 517
  • [3] Radiation dose reduction in CT-guided cryoablation of renal tumors
    Zhong, Jim
    Gallagher, Michael
    Hounslow, Chris
    Iball, Gareth
    Wah, Tze
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (02) : 244 - 248
  • [4] Radiation Dose Reduction in CT-Guided Spine Biopsies Does Not Reduce Diagnostic Yield
    Shpilberg, K. A.
    Delman, B. N.
    Tanenbaum, L. N.
    Esses, S. J.
    Subramaniam, R.
    Doshi, A. H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (12) : 2243 - 2247
  • [5] Evaluation of the impact of a system for real-time visualisation of occupational radiation dose rate during fluoroscopically guided procedures
    Sandblom, V.
    Mai, T.
    Almen, A.
    Rystedt, H.
    Cederblad, A.
    Bath, M.
    Lundh, C.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2013, 33 (03) : 693 - 702
  • [6] Evaluation of Methods of Displaying the Real-Time Scattered Radiation Distribution during Fluoroscopically-Guided Interventions for Staff Dose Reduction
    Kilian-Meneghin, J.
    Xiong, Z.
    Guo, C.
    Rudin, S.
    Bednarek, D. R.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 10573
  • [7] Radiation dose during CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: Effect of a dose reduction protocol
    Levesque, Vincent M.
    Shyn, Paul B.
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Tatli, Servet
    Nawfel, Richard D.
    Olubiyi, Olutayo
    Silverman, Stuart G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (11) : 2218 - 2221
  • [8] Reduction of radiation dose using real-time visual feedback dosimetry during angiographic interventions
    Koch, Vitali
    Conrades, Lena Marie
    Gruenewald, Leon D.
    Eichler, Katrin
    Martin, Simon S.
    Booz, Christian
    D'Angelo, Tommaso
    Yel, Ibrahim
    Bernatz, Simon
    Mahmoudi, Scherwin
    Albrecht, Moritz H.
    Scholtz, Jan-Erik
    Thalhammer, Axel
    Zangos, Stephan
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (02):
  • [9] Impact of interventionalist's experience and gender on radiation dose and procedural time in CT-guided interventions-a retrospective analysis of 4380 cases over 10 years
    Theilig, Dorothea
    Mayerhofer, Anna
    Petschelt, David
    Elkilany, Aboelyazid
    Hamm, Bernd
    Gebauer, Bernhard
    Geisel, Dominik
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 569 - 579
  • [10] First experiences of a low-dose protocol for CT-guided musculoskeletal biopsies combining different radiation dose reduction techniques
    Alagic, Zlatan
    Alagic, Haris
    Bujila, Robert
    Srivastava, Subhash
    Jasim, Saif
    Lindqvist, Maria
    Wick, Marius C.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (01) : 28 - 36