Small field measurements using electronic portal imaging device

被引:0
作者
Sait, A. Aziz [1 ]
Yoganathan, S. A. [2 ]
Jones, Glenn W. [3 ]
Patel, Tusar [4 ]
Rastogi, Nikhil [1 ]
Pandey, S. P. [1 ,5 ]
Mani, Sunil [4 ]
Boopathy, Raghavendiran [6 ]
机构
[1] Teerthanker Mahaveer Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Phys, Moradabad, India
[2] Hamad Med Corp Doha, Radiat Oncol, NCCCR, Doha, Qatar
[3] Univ West Indies, Sch Clin Med & Res, Nassau, Bahamas
[4] Adv Med Phys, Dept Med Phys, Houston, TX USA
[5] Delhi Tech Campus, Knowledge Pk 3, Greater Noida, UP, India
[6] Univ Oklahoma, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Norman, OK USA
来源
BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS | 2024年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
epid; small field; quality assurance; stereotactic; output factor; pdd; profiles; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1088/2057-1976/ad5a9e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objective. Small-field measurement poses challenges. Although many high-resolution detectors are commercially available, the EPID for small-field dosimetry remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EPID for small-field measurements and to derive tailored correction factors for precise small-field dosimetry verification. Material/Methods. Six high-resolution radiation detectors, including W2 and W1 plastic scintillators, Edge-detector, microSilicon, microDiamond and EPID were utilized. The output factors, depth doses and profiles, were measured for various beam energies (6 MV-FF, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV-FF, and 10 MV-FFF) and field sizes (10 x 10 cm2, 5 x 5 cm2, 4 x 4 cm2, 3 x 3 cm2, 2 x 2 cm2, 1 x 1 cm2, 0.5 x 0.5 cm2) using a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator. During measurements, acrylic plates of appropriate depth were placed on the EPID, while a 3D water tank was used with five-point detectors. EPID measured data were compared with W2 plastic scintillator and measurements from other high-resolution detectors. The analysis included percentage deviations in output factors, differences in percentage for PDD and for the profiles, FWHM, maximum difference in the flat region, penumbra, and 1D gamma were analyzed. The output factor and depth dose ratios were fitted using exponential functions and fractional polynomial fitting in STATA 16.2, with W2 scintillator as reference, and corresponding formulae were obtained. The established correction factors were validated using two Truebeam machines. Results. When comparing EPID and W2-PSD across all field-sizes and energies, the deviation for output factors ranged from 1% to 15%. Depth doses, the percentage difference beyond dmax ranged from 1% to 19%. For profiles, maximum of 4% was observed in the 100%-80% region. The correction factor formulae were validated with two independent EPIDs and closely matched within 3%. Conclusion. EPID can effectively serve as small-field dosimetry verification tool with appropriate correction factors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Verification of radiosurgery target point alignment with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)
    Dong, L
    Shiu, A
    Tung, S
    Boyer, A
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (02) : 263 - 267
  • [42] Detection of organ movement in cervix cancer patients using a fluoroscopic electronic portal imaging device and radiopaque markers
    Kaatee, RSJP
    Olofsen, MJJ
    Verstraate, MBJ
    Quint, S
    Heijmen, BJM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (02): : 576 - 583
  • [43] VERIFICATION OF LUNG ATTENUATOR POSITIONING BEFORE TOTAL-BODY IRRADIATION USING AN ELECTRONIC PORTAL IMAGING DEVICE
    GLADSTONE, DJ
    VANHERK, M
    CHIN, LM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 (02): : 449 - 454
  • [44] Imaging linear accelerator output using a high-speed scintillation based electronic portal imaging device (Hi-EPID)
    Ranade, Manisha
    Lynch, Bart
    Li, Jonathan
    Kim, Siyong
    Dempsey, James
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2006, VOL 14, PTS 1-6, 2007, 14 : 1811 - +
  • [45] Dosimetric characteristics and day-to-day performance of an amorphous-silicon type electronic portal imaging device
    Chang, Chiou-Shiung
    Tseng, Yi-Han
    Hwang, Jing-Min
    Shih, Rompin
    Chuang, Keh-Shih
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2016, 91 : 9 - 14
  • [46] Long-term performance monitoring of a-Si 1200 electronic portal imaging device for dosimetric applications
    Kutuzov, Ivan
    Rivest, Ryan
    Vanuytven, Eric
    McCurdy, Boyd
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 26 (01):
  • [47] A new approach in the design of electronic portal imaging devices for portal dosimetry in radiotherapy
    Badel, J. -N.
    Partouche-Sebban, D.
    Abraham, I.
    Carrie, C.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 30 (06): : 644 - 653
  • [48] Dose verifications by use of liquid ionization chamber of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID).
    Tateoka K.
    Oouchi A.
    Nakata K.
    Hareyama M.
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2008, 1 (2) : 171 - 177
  • [49] The experience of a developing country using an electronic portal imaging device for the verification of patient positioning and dosimetry in radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Farhat, Leila
    Fourati, N.
    Mnejja, W.
    Daoud, J.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2018, 17 (03) : 297 - 301
  • [50] Fast 3D dosimetric verifications based on an electronic portal imaging device using a GPU calculation engine
    Zhu, Jinhan
    Chen, Lixin
    Chen, Along
    Luo, Guangwen
    Deng, Xiaowu
    Liu, Xiaowei
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10