Small field measurements using electronic portal imaging device

被引:0
作者
Sait, A. Aziz [1 ]
Yoganathan, S. A. [2 ]
Jones, Glenn W. [3 ]
Patel, Tusar [4 ]
Rastogi, Nikhil [1 ]
Pandey, S. P. [1 ,5 ]
Mani, Sunil [4 ]
Boopathy, Raghavendiran [6 ]
机构
[1] Teerthanker Mahaveer Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Phys, Moradabad, India
[2] Hamad Med Corp Doha, Radiat Oncol, NCCCR, Doha, Qatar
[3] Univ West Indies, Sch Clin Med & Res, Nassau, Bahamas
[4] Adv Med Phys, Dept Med Phys, Houston, TX USA
[5] Delhi Tech Campus, Knowledge Pk 3, Greater Noida, UP, India
[6] Univ Oklahoma, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Norman, OK USA
来源
BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS | 2024年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
epid; small field; quality assurance; stereotactic; output factor; pdd; profiles; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1088/2057-1976/ad5a9e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objective. Small-field measurement poses challenges. Although many high-resolution detectors are commercially available, the EPID for small-field dosimetry remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EPID for small-field measurements and to derive tailored correction factors for precise small-field dosimetry verification. Material/Methods. Six high-resolution radiation detectors, including W2 and W1 plastic scintillators, Edge-detector, microSilicon, microDiamond and EPID were utilized. The output factors, depth doses and profiles, were measured for various beam energies (6 MV-FF, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV-FF, and 10 MV-FFF) and field sizes (10 x 10 cm2, 5 x 5 cm2, 4 x 4 cm2, 3 x 3 cm2, 2 x 2 cm2, 1 x 1 cm2, 0.5 x 0.5 cm2) using a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator. During measurements, acrylic plates of appropriate depth were placed on the EPID, while a 3D water tank was used with five-point detectors. EPID measured data were compared with W2 plastic scintillator and measurements from other high-resolution detectors. The analysis included percentage deviations in output factors, differences in percentage for PDD and for the profiles, FWHM, maximum difference in the flat region, penumbra, and 1D gamma were analyzed. The output factor and depth dose ratios were fitted using exponential functions and fractional polynomial fitting in STATA 16.2, with W2 scintillator as reference, and corresponding formulae were obtained. The established correction factors were validated using two Truebeam machines. Results. When comparing EPID and W2-PSD across all field-sizes and energies, the deviation for output factors ranged from 1% to 15%. Depth doses, the percentage difference beyond dmax ranged from 1% to 19%. For profiles, maximum of 4% was observed in the 100%-80% region. The correction factor formulae were validated with two independent EPIDs and closely matched within 3%. Conclusion. EPID can effectively serve as small-field dosimetry verification tool with appropriate correction factors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Commissioning and Evaluation of an Electronic Portal Imaging Device-Based In-Vivo Dosimetry Software
    Held, Mareike
    Cheung, Joey
    Andujar, Angelica Perez
    Husson, Francois
    Morin, Olivier
    CUREUS, 2018, 10 (02):
  • [32] Two-dimensional measurement of photon beam attenuation by the treatment couch and immobilization devices using an electronic portal imaging device
    Vieira, SC
    Kaatee, RSJP
    Dirkx, MLP
    Heijmen, BJM
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (11) : 2981 - 2987
  • [33] Accuracy of the dose delivery in prostate cancer patients-using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)
    Mahdavi, S. R.
    Gharehbagh, E. Jazayeri
    Mofid, B.
    Jafari, A. H.
    Nikoofar, A. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2017, 15 (01): : 39 - 47
  • [34] Verification of milled two-dimensional photon compensating filters using an electronic portal imaging device
    Low, DA
    Li, ZF
    Klein, EE
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (06) : 929 - 938
  • [35] A Clinical Objective IMRT QA Method Based on Portal Dosimetry and Electronic Portal Imager Device (EPID) Measurement
    Zhang, Miao
    Qin, Songbing
    Chen, Ting
    Kim, Sung
    Jabbour, Salma
    Haffty, Bruce
    Yue, Ning J.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2013, 12 (02) : 145 - 150
  • [36] Assessment of Multi-leaf Collimator Positional Accuracy Using Radiochromic EBT3 Film and an Electronic Portal Imaging Device
    Forough Nikeghbali
    Abolfazl Nickfarjam
    Fateme Shirani
    Nouraddin Abdi Goushbolagh
    Nasim Namiranian
    Bagher Farhood
    Masoud Shabani
    Kazem Vakili
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2020, 76 : 795 - 801
  • [37] Assessment of Multi-leaf Collimator Positional Accuracy Using Radiochromic EBT3 Film and an Electronic Portal Imaging Device
    Nikeghbali, Forough
    Nickfarjam, Abolfazl
    Shirani, Fateme
    Goushbolagh, Nouraddin Abdi
    Namiranian, Nasim
    Farhood, Bagher
    Shabani, Masoud
    Vakili, Kazem
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 76 (09) : 795 - 801
  • [38] Three year experience of electronic portal imaging device based daily QA for photon radiation beams
    Cai, Bin
    He, Yu
    Bollinger, Douglas
    Li, Hua
    Goddu, Sreekrishna M.
    Mutic, Sasa
    Sun, Baozhou
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2019, 5 (01):
  • [39] Fast, daily linac verification for segmented IMRT using electronic portal imaging
    Vieira, Sandra C.
    Bolt, Rene A.
    Dirkx, Maarten L. P.
    Visser, Andries G.
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 80 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [40] Electronic Portal Imaging Device Dosimetry for IMRT: a Review on Commercially Available Solutions
    Bawazeer, Omemh
    Herath, Sisira
    Sarasanandarajah, Siva
    Deb, Pradip
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2015, 51 : 553 - 556