Small field measurements using electronic portal imaging device

被引:0
|
作者
Sait, A. Aziz [1 ]
Yoganathan, S. A. [2 ]
Jones, Glenn W. [3 ]
Patel, Tusar [4 ]
Rastogi, Nikhil [1 ]
Pandey, S. P. [1 ,5 ]
Mani, Sunil [4 ]
Boopathy, Raghavendiran [6 ]
机构
[1] Teerthanker Mahaveer Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Phys, Moradabad, India
[2] Hamad Med Corp Doha, Radiat Oncol, NCCCR, Doha, Qatar
[3] Univ West Indies, Sch Clin Med & Res, Nassau, Bahamas
[4] Adv Med Phys, Dept Med Phys, Houston, TX USA
[5] Delhi Tech Campus, Knowledge Pk 3, Greater Noida, UP, India
[6] Univ Oklahoma, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Norman, OK USA
来源
BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS | 2024年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
epid; small field; quality assurance; stereotactic; output factor; pdd; profiles; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1088/2057-1976/ad5a9e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objective. Small-field measurement poses challenges. Although many high-resolution detectors are commercially available, the EPID for small-field dosimetry remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EPID for small-field measurements and to derive tailored correction factors for precise small-field dosimetry verification. Material/Methods. Six high-resolution radiation detectors, including W2 and W1 plastic scintillators, Edge-detector, microSilicon, microDiamond and EPID were utilized. The output factors, depth doses and profiles, were measured for various beam energies (6 MV-FF, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV-FF, and 10 MV-FFF) and field sizes (10 x 10 cm2, 5 x 5 cm2, 4 x 4 cm2, 3 x 3 cm2, 2 x 2 cm2, 1 x 1 cm2, 0.5 x 0.5 cm2) using a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator. During measurements, acrylic plates of appropriate depth were placed on the EPID, while a 3D water tank was used with five-point detectors. EPID measured data were compared with W2 plastic scintillator and measurements from other high-resolution detectors. The analysis included percentage deviations in output factors, differences in percentage for PDD and for the profiles, FWHM, maximum difference in the flat region, penumbra, and 1D gamma were analyzed. The output factor and depth dose ratios were fitted using exponential functions and fractional polynomial fitting in STATA 16.2, with W2 scintillator as reference, and corresponding formulae were obtained. The established correction factors were validated using two Truebeam machines. Results. When comparing EPID and W2-PSD across all field-sizes and energies, the deviation for output factors ranged from 1% to 15%. Depth doses, the percentage difference beyond dmax ranged from 1% to 19%. For profiles, maximum of 4% was observed in the 100%-80% region. The correction factor formulae were validated with two independent EPIDs and closely matched within 3%. Conclusion. EPID can effectively serve as small-field dosimetry verification tool with appropriate correction factors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The linear accelerator mechanical and radiation isocentre assessment with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)
    Liu G.
    van Doorn T.
    Bezak E.
    Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2004, 27 (3): : 111 - 117
  • [22] Transit dosimetry with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for 115 prostate cancer patients
    Pasma, KL
    Kroonwijk, M
    Quint, S
    Visser, AG
    Heijmen, BJM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (05): : 1297 - 1303
  • [23] Modeling the temporal-spatial nature of the readout of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)
    Abbasian, Parandoush
    McCowan, Peter M.
    Rickey, Daniel W.
    Van Uytven, Eric
    McCurdy, Boyd M. C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (10) : 5301 - 5311
  • [24] A method for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT and VMAT based on electronic portal imaging device
    Jun Zhang
    Xiuqing Li
    Miaomiao Lu
    Qilin Zhang
    Xile Zhang
    Ruijie Yang
    Maria F. Chan
    Junhai Wen
    Radiation Oncology, 16
  • [25] Clinical Feasibility of Using an Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Position Verification during Conventional Radiotherapy
    Shen, Yuxiaotong
    Zhang, Jie
    Ge, Yun
    Chen, Ying
    Li, Haiwei
    Sun, Wei
    Ji, Mingxi
    Wei, Quanbo
    Cai, Jing
    Li, Bing
    2016 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NANO/MOLECULAR MEDICINE AND ENGINEERING (NANOMED), 2016, : 99 - 103
  • [26] Dosimetric characteristics of a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device
    Essers, M
    Hoogervorst, BR
    vanHerk, M
    Lanson, H
    Mijnheer, BJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (05): : 1265 - 1272
  • [27] Reliability analysis of an Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID) of a linear accelerator
    Gouveia, Clesia
    Sobral, Jose
    2023 IEEE 7TH PORTUGUESE MEETING ON BIOENGINEERING, ENBENG, 2023, : 52 - 55
  • [28] Use of a megavoltage electronic portal imaging device to identify prosthetic materials
    Moutrie, Vaughan
    Kairn, Tanya
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly
    Charles, Paul H.
    AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2015, 38 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [29] Use of a megavoltage electronic portal imaging device to identify prosthetic materials
    Vaughan Moutrie
    Tanya Kairn
    Anatoly Rosenfeld
    Paul H. Charles
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2015, 38 : 93 - 100
  • [30] Transmission dosimetry with a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device
    Essers, M
    Boellaard, R
    vanHerk, M
    Lanson, H
    Mijnheer, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 34 (04): : 931 - 941