Small field measurements using electronic portal imaging device

被引:0
|
作者
Sait, A. Aziz [1 ]
Yoganathan, S. A. [2 ]
Jones, Glenn W. [3 ]
Patel, Tusar [4 ]
Rastogi, Nikhil [1 ]
Pandey, S. P. [1 ,5 ]
Mani, Sunil [4 ]
Boopathy, Raghavendiran [6 ]
机构
[1] Teerthanker Mahaveer Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Phys, Moradabad, India
[2] Hamad Med Corp Doha, Radiat Oncol, NCCCR, Doha, Qatar
[3] Univ West Indies, Sch Clin Med & Res, Nassau, Bahamas
[4] Adv Med Phys, Dept Med Phys, Houston, TX USA
[5] Delhi Tech Campus, Knowledge Pk 3, Greater Noida, UP, India
[6] Univ Oklahoma, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Norman, OK USA
来源
BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS | 2024年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
epid; small field; quality assurance; stereotactic; output factor; pdd; profiles; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1088/2057-1976/ad5a9e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objective. Small-field measurement poses challenges. Although many high-resolution detectors are commercially available, the EPID for small-field dosimetry remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EPID for small-field measurements and to derive tailored correction factors for precise small-field dosimetry verification. Material/Methods. Six high-resolution radiation detectors, including W2 and W1 plastic scintillators, Edge-detector, microSilicon, microDiamond and EPID were utilized. The output factors, depth doses and profiles, were measured for various beam energies (6 MV-FF, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV-FF, and 10 MV-FFF) and field sizes (10 x 10 cm2, 5 x 5 cm2, 4 x 4 cm2, 3 x 3 cm2, 2 x 2 cm2, 1 x 1 cm2, 0.5 x 0.5 cm2) using a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator. During measurements, acrylic plates of appropriate depth were placed on the EPID, while a 3D water tank was used with five-point detectors. EPID measured data were compared with W2 plastic scintillator and measurements from other high-resolution detectors. The analysis included percentage deviations in output factors, differences in percentage for PDD and for the profiles, FWHM, maximum difference in the flat region, penumbra, and 1D gamma were analyzed. The output factor and depth dose ratios were fitted using exponential functions and fractional polynomial fitting in STATA 16.2, with W2 scintillator as reference, and corresponding formulae were obtained. The established correction factors were validated using two Truebeam machines. Results. When comparing EPID and W2-PSD across all field-sizes and energies, the deviation for output factors ranged from 1% to 15%. Depth doses, the percentage difference beyond dmax ranged from 1% to 19%. For profiles, maximum of 4% was observed in the 100%-80% region. The correction factor formulae were validated with two independent EPIDs and closely matched within 3%. Conclusion. EPID can effectively serve as small-field dosimetry verification tool with appropriate correction factors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Verification of compensator thicknesses using a fluoroscopic electronic portal imaging device
    Pasma, KL
    Kroonwijk, M
    van Dieren, EB
    Visser, AG
    Heijmen, BJM
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (08) : 1524 - 1529
  • [2] Development of an Electronic Portal Imaging Device Dosimetry Method
    Zhang, Jun
    Fan, Ziting
    Zhang, Xile
    Yang, Ruijie
    Wen, Junhai
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (09)
  • [3] Clinical practice and evaluation of electronic portal imaging device for VMAT quality assurance
    Huang, Yen-Cho
    Yeh, Chien-Yi
    Yeh, Jih-Hsiang
    Lo, Ching-Jung
    Tsai, Ping-Fang
    Hung, Chih-Hung
    Tsai, Chieh-Sheng
    Chen, Chen-Yuan
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [4] A method for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT and VMAT based on electronic portal imaging device
    Zhang, Jun
    Li, Xiuqing
    Lu, Miaomiao
    Zhang, Qilin
    Zhang, Xile
    Yang, Ruijie
    Chan, Maria F.
    Wen, Junhai
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [5] The feasibility of the pretreatment verification of 2D dose distributions in radiation therapy with small fields using the electronic portal imaging device
    Tuncel, Nina
    Mahdavi, Seied Rabi
    Haghparast, Mohammad
    Karakus, Ismail
    Haghparast, Abbas
    Nazari, Vahideh
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 : S815 - S820
  • [6] Development and testing of an improved dosimetry system using a backscatter shielded electronic portal imaging device
    King, Brian W.
    Morf, Daniel
    Greer, Peter B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (05) : 2839 - 2847
  • [7] Study of X-ray field junction dose using an a-Si electronic portal imaging device
    Madebo, Mebratu
    Perkins, A.
    Fox, C.
    Johnston, P.
    Kron, T.
    AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2010, 33 (01) : 45 - 50
  • [8] Study of X-ray field junction dose using an a-Si electronic portal imaging device
    Mebratu Madebo
    A. Perkins
    C. Fox
    P. Johnston
    T. Kron
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2010, 33 : 45 - 50
  • [9] Verification of multileaf collimator leaf positions using an electronic portal imaging device
    Samant, SS
    Zheng, W
    Parra, NA
    Chandler, J
    Gopal, A
    Wu, J
    Jain, J
    Zhu, YP
    Sontag, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (12) : 2900 - 2912
  • [10] Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study
    Fenoglietto, P.
    Khodri, M.
    Nguyen, D.
    Josserand-Pietri, F.
    Ailleres, N.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11