When do trademarks improve the measurement of innovation? An analysis of innovations from Dutch SMEs

被引:4
作者
Morales, Pablo [1 ]
Flikkema, Meindert [2 ]
Castaldi, Carolina [3 ]
de Man, Ard-Pieter [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Educ & Learning Sci Grp, POB 8130 Bode 68, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Management & Org, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Vening Meineszgebouw A, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
trademarks; patents; innovation measurement; SME; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; SERVICE MARKS; CAPTURE VALUE; PATENTS; FIRMS; INDICATORS; COLLABORATION; EXPLORATION; PERFORMANCE; PROPENSITY;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scae035
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Effective innovation policymaking critically relies on monitoring innovation. An emerging literature suggests that trademarks could help measure a larger share of innovations than when only utilizing patents, particularly for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This study establishes when trademarks improve the measurement of innovation compared to solely relying on patents as innovation metrics, by examining the propensity to use trademarks for non-patented innovations from SMEs. We collected multiple original samples of innovations from Dutch SMEs and assessed the extent to which trademarks and/or patents were filed for those innovations. Our results show that trademarks can improve innovation measurement for SMEs, particularly in scale-intensive and supplier-dominated industries and in some service industries-areas where patent propensities are low. Our results bear implications for monitoring innovation and evaluating science, research, and innovation policy. Overall, by combining trademark and patent data, the number of measured innovations by SMEs increases approximately by a relative of 51.8 per cent.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 938
页数:16
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Individual inventors and market potentials: Evidence from US patents
    Agiakloglou, Christos
    Drivas, Kyriakos
    Karamanis, Dimitris
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2016, 43 (02) : 147 - 156
  • [2] Amoroso S., 2021, World Corporate Top RD Investors: Paving the Way for Climate Neutrality
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, Community Innovation Survey (CIS)
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, Unleashing the Full Potential of European SMEs
  • [5] [Anonymous], Sme definition
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, V4th, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264304604-EN, 10.1787/9789264304604-en]
  • [7] [Anonymous], Horizon Europe
  • [8] Archibugi D., 1992, SCI PUBL POLICY, V19, P357, DOI DOI 10.1093/SPP/19.6.357
  • [9] The interplay between technology characteristics, R&D internationalisation, and new product introduction: Empirical evidence from the energy conservation sector
    Ardito, Lorenzo
    Ernst, Holger
    Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2020, 96-97
  • [10] The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation
    Arundel, A
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2001, 30 (04) : 611 - 624