Fetal dose assessment in a pregnant patient with brain tumor: A comparative study of proton PBS and 3DCRT/VMAT radiation therapy techniques

被引:2
|
作者
Rahimi, Robabeh [1 ,2 ]
Taylor, Michael [1 ]
Li, Xing [1 ]
Chen, Kuan Ling [1 ]
MacLennan, Grayden [1 ]
Murdoch, Erin [1 ]
Chang, Lienard [1 ]
Parniani, Ashkan [1 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ]
Chawla, Ashish [1 ]
Fan, Jiajin [1 ]
Kim, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Inova Hlth Syst, Radiat Oncol Dept, Fairfax, VA USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 08期
关键词
3D conformal radiation therapy; brain tumor; fetal dose; neutron dose; pencil beam scanning; proton therapy; re-irradiation; volumetric-modulated arc therapy; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14394
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeThe treatment of brain tumors in pregnant patients poses challenges, as the out-of-field dose exposure to the fetus can potentially be harmful. A pregnant patient with prior radiation treatment was presented with a brain tumor at our clinic. This work reports on our pre-treatment study that compared fetal dose exposure between intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using pencil beam scanning (PBS) and conventional photon 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and the subsequent pregnant patient's radiation treatment.Materials and methodsPre-treatment measurements of clinical plans, 3DCRT, VMAT, and IMPT, were conducted on a phantom. Measurements were performed using a device capable of neutron detections, closely following AAPM guidelines, TG158. For photon measurements, fetus shielding was utilized. On patient treatment days, which was determined to be proton treatment, shielding was used only during daily imaging for patient setup. Additionally, an in vivo measurement was conducted on the patient.ResultsMeasurements showed that IMPT delivered the lowest fetal dose, considering both photon and neutron out-of-field doses to the fetus, even when shielding was implemented for photon measurements. Additionally, the proton plans demonstrated superior treatment for the mother, a reirradiation case.ConclusionThe patient was treated with proton therapy, and the baby was subsequently delivered at full term with no complications. This case study supports previous clinical findings and advocates for the expanded use of proton therapy in this patient population.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Dosimetric comparative study of 3DCRT, IMRT, VMAT, Ecomp, and Hybrid techniques for breast radiation therapy
    Chen, Semaya Natalia
    Ramachandran, Prabhakar
    Deb, Pradip
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 38 (04): : 270 - 281
  • [2] A comprehensive dosimetric study of pancreatic cancer treatment using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated radiation therapy (VMAT), and passive-scattering and modulated-scanning proton therapy (PT)
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    Dionisi, Francesco
    Tang, Shikui
    Ingram, Mark
    Hung, Chun-Yu
    Prionas, Evangelos
    Lichtenwalner, Phil
    Butterwick, Ian
    Zhai, Huifang
    Yin, Lingshu
    Lin, Haibo
    Kassaee, Alireza
    Avery, Stephen
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [3] Dose assessment for the fetus considering scattered and secondary radiation from photon and proton therapy when treating a brain tumor of the mother
    Geng, Changran
    Moteabbed, Maryam
    Seco, Joao
    Gao, Yiming
    Xu, X. George
    Ramos-Mendez, Jose
    Faddegon, Bruce
    Paganetti, Harald
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (02) : 683 - 695
  • [4] Target coverage and cardiopulmonary sparing with the updated ESTRO-ACROP contouring guidelines for postmastectomy radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: a treatment planning study using VMAT and proton PBS techniques
    Milligan, Michael G.
    Zieminski, Stephen
    Johnson, Andrew
    Depauw, Nicolas
    Rosado, Nikki
    Specht, Michelle C.
    Liao, Eric C.
    Jimenez, Rachel B.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (11) : 1440 - 1451