Effect of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy on the adenoma detection rate: A systematic review

被引:0
作者
Mwango, Anson [1 ,2 ]
Akhtar, Tayyab Saeed [2 ,3 ]
Abbas, Sameen [4 ]
Abbasi, Dua Sadaf [4 ]
Khan, Amjad [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nairobi, Dept Clin Med & Therapeut, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Univ South Wales, Fac Life Sci & Educ, Cardiff, Wales
[3] Holy Family Hosp, Ctr Liver & Digest Dis, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
[4] Quaid I Azam Univ, Dept Pharm, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
[5] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharm Adm & Clin Pharm, Xian, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION | 2024年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
Adenoma; Artificial intelligence; Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.18528/ijgii240013
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Colorectal cancer has substantial morbidity and mortality. Approximately one-quarter of cases are overlooked during screening colonoscopy, leading to interval colorectal cancer. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) through deep learning systems has demonstrated promising results in the detection of polyps and adenomas. Consequently, our objective was to evaluate the impact of AI on adenoma detection. To identify relevant studies, we searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases without restrictions on publication date. Ultimately, we analyzed 16 randomized controlled trials involving 13,685 participants. The primary outcome assessed was the effect of AI-assisted colonoscopy (AIAC) on the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes included the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenomas per colonoscopy (APC). A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled effect sizes, and statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using the Higgins I2 statistic, with I2 cutoff points of 25%, 50%, and 75% indicating low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively. Publication bias was investigated using a funnel plot, and the quality of evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. The findings indicated a 26% greater ADR with AIAC than with standard colonoscopy (40.4% vs. 31.9%). Additionally, AIAC was associated with a 30% greater PDR (52.9% vs. 40.1%) and a 44% higher APC. The findings demonstrate that the integration of AI in colonoscopy improves ADR, PDR, and APC, potentially reducing the incidence of interval colorectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a real-time computer-aided polyp detection system during screening colonoscopy: AI-DETECT study
    Ahmad, Ahmir
    Wilson, Ana
    Haycock, Adam
    Humphries, Adam
    Monahan, Kevin
    Suzuki, Noriko
    Thomas-Gibson, Siwan
    Vance, Margaret
    Bassett, Paul
    Thiruvilangam, Kowshika
    Dhillon, Angad
    Saunders, Brian P.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 (04) : 313 - 319
  • [2] Computer-aided detection, mucosal exposure device, their combination, and standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized controlled trial
    Aniwan, Satimai
    Mekritthikrai, Krittaya
    Kerr, Stephen J.
    Tiankanon, Kasenee
    Vandaungden, Kunvadee
    Sritunyarat, Yingluk
    Piyachaturawat, Panida
    Luangsukrerk, Thanawat
    Kulpatcharapong, Santi
    Wisedopas, Naruemon
    Kongtub, Natanong
    Kullavanijaya, Pinit
    Rerknimitr, Rungsun
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (03) : 507 - 516
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study
    Areia, Miguel
    Mori, Yuichi
    Correale, Loredana
    Repici, Alessandro
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Sharma, Prateek
    Taveira, Filipe
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Ebigbo, Alanna
    Kudo, Shin-Ei
    Arribas, Julia
    Barua, Ishita
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    Messmann, Helmut
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Hassan, Cesare
    [J]. LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 4 (06): : E436 - E444
  • [4] Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Barua, Ishita
    Vinsard, Daniela Guerrero
    Jodal, Henriette C.
    Loberg, Magnus
    Kalager, Mette
    Holme, Oyvind
    Misawa, Masashi
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Mori, Yuichi
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 53 (03) : 277 - 284
  • [5] Deep Learning Computer-aided Polyp Detection Reduces Adenoma Miss Rate: A United States Multi-center Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study (CADeT-CS Trial)
    Brown, Jeremy R. Glissen
    Mansour, Nabil M.
    Wang, Pu
    Chuchuca, Maria Aguilera
    Minchenberg, Scott B.
    Chandnani, Madhuri
    Liu, Lin
    Gross, Seth A.
    Sengupta, Neil
    Berzin, Tyler M.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 20 (07) : 1499 - +
  • [6] Corley DA, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P1298, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1309086, 10.1056/NEJMc1405329]
  • [7] Usefulness of a novel computer-aided detection system for colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial
    Gimeno-Garcia, Antonio Z.
    Negrin, Domingo Hernandez
    Hernandez, Anjara
    Nicolas-Perez, David
    Rodriguez, Eduardo
    Montesdeoca, Carlota
    Alarcon, Onofre
    Romero, Rafael
    Dorta, Jose Luis Baute
    Cedres, Yaiza
    del Castillo, Rocio
    Jimenez, Alejandro
    Felipe, Vanessa
    Morales, Dalia
    Ortega, Juan
    Reygosa, Cristina
    Quintero, Enrique
    Hernandez-Guerra, Manuel
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (03) : 528 - +
  • [8] Use of the GRADE approach in systematic reviews and guidelines
    Granholm, Anders
    Alhazzani, Waleed
    Moller, Morten H.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 123 (05) : 554 - 559
  • [9] Measuring inconsistency in knowledgebases
    Grant, John
    Hunter, Anthony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2006, 27 (02) : 159 - 184
  • [10] Current status and limitations of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy
    Hann, Alexander
    Troya, Joel
    Fitting, Daniel
    [J]. UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 9 (05) : 527 - 533