Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Flexible Plastic Packaging under a Sustainable Circular Economy Approach

被引:2
作者
Tuncok-Cesme, Borce [1 ]
Yildiz-Geyhan, Eren [2 ]
Ciftcioglu, Gokcen Alev [1 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Dept Chem Engn, TR-34854 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Maltepe Municipal, TR-34843 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
circular economy; LCA; life cycle assessment; flexible packaging; environmental life cycle assessment (ELCA); SimaPro; sustainability;
D O I
10.3390/su16083149
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While it is of great importance to evaluate plastic waste within the framework of a circular economy today, it is also of great importance to evaluate flexible plastic packaging, which is increasingly used in order to prevent environmental problems. To avoid the disadvantages experienced in recycling due to its multilayer nature, in this study, a life cycle assessment was made for flexible packages consisting of PET/metallized PET/PE and PP/metallized PP/PP with the data provided by the R&D Center of Elif Plastik Ambalaj Sanayi ve Tic. A.& Scedil;.-Huhtamaki Flexibles Istanbul. Within the scope of this evaluation, two types of flexible packaging were analyzed, and an optimal flexible packaging structure for T & uuml;rkiye was revealed by comparing different scenarios based on different methods in SimaPro 8.1.1.16. LCA was performed for both packages with cumulative energy demand (CED) and CML-IA methods. Four scenarios with different amounts of recycled raw materials were compared against the existing system and a fifth scenario, where electricity is assumed to be obtained from solar energy. Overall, we found that the largest environmental impact was in the existing system. However, despite being a renewable energy source, we observed that the solar energy scenario had almost as significant an impact as the existing system. When scenarios involving recycled raw materials were examined, we clearly observed that as the amount of recycled raw materials increased, the environmental impact decreased. Therefore, it emerged that the scenario with the highest amount of recycled raw materials is the most optimal scenario in many respects. There are clear differences in the results due to differences in plastic types. This study, conducted with real data, is highly important for the flexible packaging literature. A table has been provided for changing the type of plastic, changing the source of electricity generation, and reducing waste by using recycled raw materials in order to make flexible packaging more environmentally beneficial.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Flexible packaging plastic waste-environmental implications, management solutions, and the way forward [J].
Ahamed, Ashiq ;
Veksha, Andrei ;
Giannis, Apostolos ;
Lisak, Grzegorz .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 32
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Plastic the Facts
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Plastic-the facts
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2024, The Future of Flexible Packaging to 2026, Smithers Pira
[6]   Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) Packaging Management Strategies in the EU [J].
Bassi, Susanna Andreasi ;
Tonini, Davide ;
Saveyn, Hans ;
Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (01) :501-511
[7]  
Biona JBMM, 2015, 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANOID, NANOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY,COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL, ENVIRONMENT AND MANAGEMENT (HNICEM), P538
[8]  
CEFLEX (Circular Economy for Flexible Packaging), 2020, Our Journey towards a Circular Economy for Flexible Packaging
[9]   Environmental assessment of the recycling process for polyamides-Polyethylene multilayer packaging films [J].
Costamagna, Mattia ;
Massaccesi, Beatrice Maria ;
Mazzucco, Devis ;
Baricco, Marcello ;
Rizzi, Paola .
SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 35
[10]   Plastic packaging goes sustainable: An analysis of consumer preferences for plastic water bottles [J].
De Marchi, Elisa ;
Pigliafreddo, Silvia ;
Banterle, Alessandro ;
Parolini, Marco ;
Cavaliere, Alessia .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 114 :305-311