The Structure of Human Prosociality: Differentiating Altruistically Motivated, Norm Motivated, Strategically Motivated, and Self-Reported Prosocial Behavior

被引:100
作者
Boeckler, Anne [1 ,2 ]
Tusche, Anita [1 ,3 ]
Singer, Tania [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Rontgenring 11, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
[3] CALTECH, Div Humanities & Social Sci, Pasadena, CA USA
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
altruism; prosocial behavior; social decision-making; interindividual differences; economic games; factor analysis; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PUNISHMENT; EVOLUTION; PERSONALITY; TRUST;
D O I
10.1177/1948550616639650
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Prosocial behavior is crucial for functioning societies. However, its reliable scientific assessment and the understanding of its underlying structure are still a challenge. We integrated 14 paradigms from diverse disciplines to identify reliable and method-independent subcomponents of human prosociality; 329 participants performed game theoretical paradigms and hypothetical distribution tasks commonly used in behavioral economics and completed interactive computer tasks and self-reports typically employed in psychology. Four subcomponents of prosociality were identified by exploratory factor analysis and verified by confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample: altruistically motivated prosocial behavior, norm motivated prosocial behavior, strategically motivated prosocial behavior, and self-reported prosocial behavior. Altruistically motivated behavior was related to gender, to enhanced cognitive skills, and to reduced negative affect. Our study provides a crucial step toward an overarching framework on prosocial behavior that will benefit future research on predictors, neural underpinnings, and plasticity of human cooperation and prosociality.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 541
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], INTELLEKTUELLE HOCHB
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, ALTRUISM HUMANS, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195341065.001.0001
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1983, Factor Analysis.
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, ATLANTA BRIEF DESCRI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1978, Psychometric theory
  • [6] Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories-IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients
    Beck, AT
    Steer, RA
    Ball, R
    Ranieri, WF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1996, 67 (03) : 588 - 597
  • [7] CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING
    BENJAMINI, Y
    HOCHBERG, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) : 289 - 300
  • [8] TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY
    BERG, J
    DICKHAUT, J
    MCCABE, K
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) : 122 - 142
  • [9] The influence of different Stop-signal response time estimation procedures on behavior-behavior and brain-behavior correlations
    Boehler, C. Nicolas
    Appelbaum, L. Gregory
    Krebs, Ruth M.
    Hopf, Jens-Max
    Woldorff, Marty G.
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2012, 229 (01) : 123 - 130
  • [10] Trust, risk and betrayal
    Bohnet, I
    Zeckhauser, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2004, 55 (04) : 467 - 484