UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND REDUCTION USING SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND HESSIAN DERIVATIVES

被引:0
作者
Sanchez, Josefina [1 ]
Otto, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Espoo, Finland
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2021 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, IDETC-CIE2021, VOL 3B | 2021年
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Robust Design; Simulation Based Design; Systems Engineering; Uncertainty Analysis; Uncertainty Modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We study the use of Hessian interaction terms to quickly identify design variables that reduce variability of system performance. To start we quantify the uncertainty and compute the variance decomposition to determine noise variables that contribute most, all at an initial design. Minimizing the uncertainty is next sought, though probabilistic optimization becomes computationally difficult, whether by including distribution parameters as an objective function or through robust design of experiments. Instead, we consider determining the more easily computed Hessian interaction matrix terms of the variance-contributing noise variables and the variables of any proposed design change. We also relate the Hessian term coefficients to subtractions in Sobol indices and reduction in response variance. Design variable changes that can reduce variability are thereby identified quickly as those with large Hessian terms against noise variables. Furthermore, the Jacobian terms of these design changes can indicate which design variables can shift the mean response, to maintain a desired nominal performance target. Using a combination of easily computed Hessian and Jacobian terms, design changes can be proposed to reduce variability while maintaining a targeted nominal. Lastly, we then recompute the uncertainty and variance decomposition at the more robust design configuration to verify the reduction in variability. This workflow therefore makes use of UQ/SA methods and computes design changes that reduce uncertainty with a minimal 4 runs per design change. An example is shown on a Stirling engine design where the top four variance-contributing tolerances are matched with two design changes identified through Hessian terms, and a new design found with 20% less variance.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Arena M.V., 2006, HIST COST GROWTH COM
[2]   Use and knowledge of robust design methodology: a survey of Swedish industry [J].
Arvidsson, M ;
Gremyr, I ;
Johansson, P .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2003, 14 (02) :129-143
[3]   Principles of robust design methodology [J].
Arvidsson, Martin ;
Gremyr, Ida .
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 24 (01) :23-35
[4]  
Iooss B., 2015, Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems, P101, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-85, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-85, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-8_5]
[5]   Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria [J].
Jin, R ;
Chen, W ;
Simpson, TW .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2001, 23 (01) :1-13
[6]  
Montgomery DC., 2017, DESIGN ANAL EXPT
[7]  
Otto K., 2019, ASME INT DES ENG TEC, V1, DOI [10.1115/DETC2019-97766, DOI 10.1115/DETC2019-97766]
[8]  
Otto K., 2019, P INT C ENG DES ICED, P1733, DOI [10.1017/dsi.2019.179, DOI 10.1017/DSI.2019.179]
[9]  
Panda K., 2018, AIAA Aviat. and Aeronaut. Forum and Exp, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2018-3102
[10]  
Pedregosa F, 2011, J MACH LEARN RES, V12, P2825