Organizational Formation for Priority Setting: Historical Perspectives and Thematic Analysis of India's Health Technology Assessment Agency

被引:1
作者
Fan, Victoria Y. [1 ]
Mehndiratta, Abha [1 ]
Ahazie, Jubilee [1 ]
Guzman, Javier [1 ]
Prinja, Shankar [2 ]
Sundararaman, T. [3 ]
Swaminathan, Soumya [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Global Dev, 2055 L St NW Floor 5, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Chandigarh, India
[3] JIPMER Int Sch Publ Hlth, Pondicherry, India
[4] MS Swaminathan Res Fdn, Chennai, India
关键词
Health technology assessment; India; organizational behavior; political economy; priority setting;
D O I
10.1080/23288604.2024.2327414
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Countries pursuing universal health coverage must set priorities to determine which benefits to add to a national health program, but the roles that organizations play are less understood. This article investigates the case of the formation of an organization with a mandate for choice of technology for public health interventions and priorities, the Health Technology Assessment India. First, we narrate a chronology of agenda setting and adoption of national policy for organizational formation drawing on historical documentation, publicly available literature, and lived experiences from coauthors. Next, we conduct a thematic analysis that examines windows of opportunity, enabling factors, barriers and conditions, roles of stakeholders, messaging and framing, and specific administrative and bureaucratic tools that facilitated organization formation. This case study shows that organizational formation relied on the identification of multiple champions with sufficient seniority and political authority across a wide group of organizations, forming a coalition of broad base support, who were keen to advance health technology assessment policy development and organizational placement or formation. The champions in turn could use their roles for policy decisions that used private and public events to raise priority and commitment to the decisions, carefully considered organizational placement and formation, and developed the network of organizations for the generation of technical evidence and capacity building for health technology assessment, strengthened by international networks and organizations with financing, expertise, and policymaker relationships.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Study Visit of Indian Delegation to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, IDSI Health Technology Assessment Capacity Questionnaire Cover Note
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 2016 C PRIOR SETT UN, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ABI and Government agree Memorandum of tandingUnders on scheme to safeguard UK flood insurance
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Twelfth five year plan 2012-2017
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Concept Note for establishing Medical Technology Assessment Board (MTAB) and institutionalizing HTA in India
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, JOINT STEER COMM M H
[8]  
Boin A., 2021, Guardians of public value: how public organisations become and remain institutions, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-51701-4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-51701-4]
[9]   The development of public institutions - Reconsidering the role of leadership [J].
Boin, Arjen ;
Christensen, Tom .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2008, 40 (03) :271-297
[10]   Political Analysis for Health Policy Implementation [J].
Campos, Paola Abril ;
Reich, Michael R. .
HEALTH SYSTEMS & REFORM, 2019, 5 (03) :224-235