Forage peanut legume as a strategy for improving beef production without increasing livestock greenhouse gas emissions

被引:3
|
作者
Homem, B. G. C. [1 ,2 ]
Borges, L. P. C. [1 ]
de Lima, I. B. G. [1 ]
Guimaraes, B. C. [1 ]
Spasiani, P. P. [1 ]
Ferreira, I. M. [1 ]
Meo-Filho, P. [3 ]
Berndt, A. [3 ]
Alves, B. J. R. [2 ]
Urquiaga, S. [2 ]
Boddey, R. M. [4 ]
Casagrande, D. R. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Lavras, Dept Anim Sci, UFLA, BR-37200900 Lavras, MG, Brazil
[2] Embrapa Agrobiol, Rodovia BR 465,Km 7, BR-23897970 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Embrapa Southeast Livestock, Rodovia Washington Luiz,Km 234, BR-13560970 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Rural Rio de Janeiro, Dept Soil Sci, Rodovia BR 465,Km 7, BR-23890000 Seropedica, RJ, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Lavras, Dept Anim Sci, Campus Univ,Caixa Postal 3037, BR-37200900 Lavras, MG, Brazil
关键词
Arachis pintoi; Forage legumes; Methane; Nitrogen fertiliser; Nitrous oxide; TILLER AGE CATEGORIES; METHANE EMISSIONS; NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; ENTERIC METHANE; NUTRITIVE-VALUE; GRASS; DIGESTIBILITY; MANAGEMENT; HERBAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.animal.2024.101158
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The transformation of pastures from a degraded state to sustainable productivity is a major challenge in tropical livestock production. Stoloniferous forage legumes such as Arachis pintoi (forage peanut) are one of the most promising alternatives for intensifying pasture-based beef livestock operations with reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This 2-year study assessed beef cattle performance, nutrient intake and digestibility, and balance of GHG emissions in three pasture types (PT): (1) mixed Palisade grass Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D. Webster (syn. Brachiaria brizantha Stapf cv. Marandu) and forage peanut (A. pintoi Krapov. & W.C. Greg. cv. BRS Mandobi) pastures (Mixed), (2) monoculture Palisade grass pastures with 150 kg of N/ha per year (Fertilised), and (3) monoculture Palisade grass without N fertiliser (Control). Continuous stocking with a variable stocking rate was used in a randomised complete block design, with four replicates per treatment. The average daily gain and carcass gain were not influenced by the PT (P = 0.439 and P = 0.100, respectively) and were, on average, 0.433 kg/animal per day and 83.4 kg/animal, respectively. Fertilised and Mixed pastures increased by 102 and 31.5%, respectively, the liveweight gain per area (kg/ha/yr) compared to the Control pasture (P < 0.001). The heifers in the Mixed pasture had lower CH4 emissions (g/animal per day; P = 0.009), achieving a reduction of 12.6 and 10.1% when compared to the Fertilised and Control pastures, respectively. Annual (N2O) emissions (g/animal) and per kg carcass weight gain were 59.8 and 63.1% lower, respectively, in the Mixed pasture compared to the Fertilised pasture (P < 0.001). Mixed pasture mitigated approximately 23% of kg CO2eq/ kg of carcass when substituting 150 kg of N/ha per year via fertiliser. Mixed pastures with forage peanut are a promising solution to recover degraded tropical pastures by providing increased animal production with lower GHG emissions. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Animal Consortium.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Improving greenhouse gas emissions intensities of subtropical and tropical beef farming systems using Leucaena leucocephala
    Harrison, Matthew T.
    McSweeney, Chris
    Tomkins, Nigel W.
    Eckard, Richard J.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 136 : 138 - 146
  • [2] Impact of the intensification of beef production in Brazil on greenhouse gas emissions and land use
    Cardoso, Abmael S.
    Berndt, Alexandre
    Leytem, April
    Alves, Bruno J. R.
    de Carvalho, Isabel das N. O.
    de Barros Soares, Luis Henrique
    Urquiaga, Segundo
    Boddey, Robert M.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 143 : 86 - 96
  • [3] The concordance between greenhouse gas emissions, livestock production and profitability of extensive beef farming systems
    Harrison, Matthew T.
    Cullen, Brendan R.
    Tomkins, Nigel W.
    McSweeney, Chris
    Cohn, Philip
    Eckard, Richard J.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (2-3) : 370 - 384
  • [4] Greenhouse gas emissions from simulated beef and dairy livestock systems in the United States
    Hope W. Phetteplace
    Donald E. Johnson
    Andrew F. Seidl
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2001, 60 : 99 - 102
  • [5] Greenhouse gas emissions from simulated beef and dairy livestock systems in the United States
    Phetteplace, HW
    Johnson, DE
    Seidl, AF
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 60 (1-3) : 99 - 102
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case study
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Janzen, H. Henry
    Little, Shannan M.
    McAllister, Tim A.
    McGinn, Sean M.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 103 (06) : 371 - 379
  • [7] Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation
    Silva, R. de Oliveira
    Barioni, L. G.
    Hall, J. A. J.
    Matsuura, M. Folegatti
    Albertini, T. Zanett
    Fernandes, F. A.
    Moran, D.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 6 (05) : 493 - +
  • [8] Improving production efficiency as a strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions on pastoral dairy farms in New Zealand
    Beukes, P. C.
    Gregorini, P.
    Romera, A. J.
    Levy, G.
    Waghorn, G. C.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 136 (3-4) : 358 - 365
  • [9] Adoption of precision livestock farming technologies has the potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from beef production
    Mcnicol, Louise C.
    Bowen, Jenna M.
    Ferguson, Holly J.
    Bell, Julian
    Dewhurst, Richard J.
    Duthie, Carol-Anne
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [10] Economics of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada
    Modongo, Oteng
    Kulshreshtha, Suren N.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 229 - 238