Item Response Ranking for Cognitive Diagnosis

被引:0
作者
Tong, Shiwei [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Runlong [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Zhenya [1 ,2 ]
Pardos, Zachary A. [3 ]
Jiang, Weijie [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Anhui Prov Key Lab Big Data Anal & Applicat, Langfang, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Data Sci, Langfang, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTIETH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2021 | 2021年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Cognitive diagnosis, a fundamental task in education area, aims at providing an approach to reveal the proficiency level of students on knowledge concepts. Actually, monotonicity is one of the basic conditions in cognitive diagnosis theory, which assumes that student's proficiency is monotonic with the probability of giving the right response to a test item. However, few of previous methods consider the monotonicity during optimization. To this end, we propose Item Response Ranking framework (IRR), aiming at introducing pairwise learning into cognitive diagnosis to well model the monotonicity between item responses. Specifically, we first use an item specific sampling method to sample item responses and construct response pairs based on their partial order, where we propose the two-branch sampling methods to handle the unobserved responses. After that, we use a pairwise objective function to exploit the monotonicity in the pair formulation. In fact, IRR is a general framework which can be applied to most of contemporary cognitive diagnosis models. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and interpretability of our method.
引用
收藏
页码:1750 / 1756
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adaptive measurement of cognitive function based on multidimensional item response theory
    Gibbons, Robert D.
    Lauderdale, Diane S.
    Wilson, Robert S.
    Bennett, David A.
    Arar, Tesnim
    Gallo, David A.
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA-TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH & CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 10 (04)
  • [42] Quantitatively ranking incorrect responses to multiple-choice questions using item response theory
    Smith, Trevor, I
    Louis, Kyle J.
    Ricci, Bartholomew J.
    Bendjilali, Nasrine
    PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2020, 16 (01):
  • [43] Investigating Differential Item Functioning via Odds Ratio in Cognitive Diagnosis Models
    Su, Ya-Hui
    Chen, Tzu-Ying
    QUANTITATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 422 : 211 - 219
  • [44] Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling Incorporating Item-Level Missing Data Mechanism
    Shan, Na
    Wang, Xiaofei
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [45] Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire: psychometric analysis from the item response theory
    Martino, Pablo
    Caycho-Rodriguez, Tomas
    Valencia, Pablo D.
    Politis, Daniel
    Gallegos, Miguel
    De Bortoli, Miguel A.
    Cervigni, Mauricio
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2022, 75 (07) : 173 - 180
  • [46] Investigating The Performance of Item Selection Algorithms in Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing
    Asiret, Semih
    Sunbul, Secil Omur
    JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY-EPOD, 2024, 15 (02): : 148 - 165
  • [47] INCREASE OF ITEM RESPONSE CONSISTENCY BY PRIOR ITEM RESPONSE
    SCHUBERT, DS
    FISKE, DW
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1973, 33 (01) : 113 - 121
  • [48] Mild to severe social fears: Ranking types of feared social situations using item response theory
    Crome, Erica
    Baillie, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2014, 28 (05) : 471 - 479
  • [49] Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory
    Junker, BW
    Sijtsma, K
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 25 (03) : 258 - 272
  • [50] COGNITIVE TENDENCIES BEHIND STUDENT RESPONSES ON A CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE TIMSS ALGEBRA ITEM
    Naalsund, Margrethe
    PME 33: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, VOL 1, 2009, 1 : 432 - 432