CO2 conversion to CO via plasma and electrolysis: a techno-economic and energy cost analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Osorio-Tejada, Jose [1 ]
Escriba-Gelonch, Marc [2 ]
Vertongen, Rani [3 ]
Bogaerts, Annemie [3 ]
Hessel, Volker [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Sch Engn, Warwick, England
[2] Univ Lleida, Dept Environm Soil Sci & Chem, Lleida, Spain
[3] Univ Antwerp, Dept Chem, Res Grp PLASMANT, Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Univ Adelaide, Sch Chem Engn, Adelaide, Australia
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
GLIDING ARC PLASMATRON; CARBON-DIOXIDE; NUMBERING-UP; ELECTROCHEMICAL REDUCTION; PROCESS WINDOWS; ELECTROREDUCTION; MICROREACTORS; PRESSURE; FIXATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1039/d4ee00164h
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Electrification and carbon capture technologies are essential for achieving net-zero emissions in the chemical sector. A crucial strategy involves converting captured CO2 into CO, a valuable chemical feedstock. This study evaluates the feasibility of two innovative methods: plasma activation and electrolysis, using clean electricity and captured CO2. Specifically, it compares a gliding arc plasma reactor with an embedded novel carbon bed system to a modern zero-gap type low-temperature electrolyser. The plasma method stood out with an energy cost of 19.5 GJ per tonne CO, marking a 43% reduction compared to electrolysis and conventional methods. CO production costs for plasma- and electrolysis-based plants were $671 and $962 per tonne, respectively. However, due to high uncertainty regarding electrolyser costs, the CO production costs in electrolysis-based plants may actually range from $570 to $1392 per tonne. The carbon bed system in the plasma method was a key factor in facilitating additional CO generation from O-2 and enhancing CO2 conversion, contributing to its cost-effectiveness. Challenges for electrolysis included high costs of equipment and low current densities. Addressing these limitations could significantly decrease production costs, but challenges arise from the mutual relationship between intrinsic parameters, such as CO2 conversion, CO2 input flow, or energy cost. In a future scenario with affordable feedstocks and equipment, costs could drop below $500 per tonne for both methods. While this may be more challenging for electrolysis due to complexity and expensive catalysts, plasma-based CO production appears more viable and competitive.
引用
收藏
页码:5833 / 5853
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pulsed electrolysis for CO2 reduction: Techno-economic perspectives
    Chung, You Lim
    Kim, Sojin
    Lee, Youngwon
    Wijaya, Devina Thasia
    Lee, Chan Woo
    Jin, Kyoungsuk
    Na, Jonggeol
    ISCIENCE, 2024, 27 (08)
  • [2] Techno-economic assessment of emerging CO2 electrolysis technologies
    Barecka, Magda H.
    Ager, Joel W.
    Lapkin, Alexei A.
    STAR PROTOCOLS, 2021, 2 (04):
  • [3] Techno-economic Analysis and Carbon Footprint Accounting for Industrial CO2 Electrolysis Systems
    Gao, Tianqi
    Xia, Baokai
    Yang, Kang
    Li, Di
    Shao, Tianye
    Chen, Sheng
    Li, Qiang
    Duan, Jingjing
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2023, 37 (23) : 17997 - 18008
  • [4] Learning from the past: Limitations of techno-economic assessments for low-temperature CO2 electrolysis
    Vos, Josephine
    Ramirez, Andrea
    Perez-Fortes, Mar
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2025, 213
  • [5] The early-stage design of plasma for the conversion of CO2 to chemicals: A prospective techno-economic assessment
    Lamberts-Van Assche, Hanne
    Thomassen, Gwenny
    Compernolle, Tine
    JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2022, 64
  • [6] Techno-economic Assessment of CO2 Electrolysis: How Interdependencies between Model Variables Propagate Across Different Modeling Scales
    Bagemihl, Isabell
    Cammann, Lucas
    Perez-Fortes, Mar
    van Steijn, Volkert
    van Ommen, J. Ruud
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (27) : 10130 - 10141
  • [7] Scale-Dependent Techno-Economic Analysis of CO2 Capture and Electroreduction to Ethylene
    Alerte, Theo
    Gaona, Adriana
    Edwards, Jonathan P.
    Gabardo, Christine M.
    O'Brien, Colin P.
    Wicks, Joshua
    Bonnenfant, Loann
    Rasouli, Armin Sedighian
    Young, Daniel
    Abed, Jehad
    Kershaw, Luke
    Xiao, Yurou Celine
    Sarkar, Amitava
    Jaffer, Shaffiq A.
    Schreiber, Moritz W.
    Sinton, David
    MacLean, Heather L.
    Sargent, Edward H.
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (43): : 15651 - 15662
  • [8] Techno-economic analysis of CO2/steam co-electrolysis process and synfuel production process coupled with steel manufacturing process
    Hong, Gi Hoon
    Lee, Juwon
    Cho, Youngtak
    Hwang, Sungwon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 40 (04) : 740 - 753
  • [9] A techno-economic evaluation approach to the electrochemical reduction of CO2 for formic acid manufacture
    Rumayor, M.
    Dominguez-Ramos, A.
    Perez, P.
    Irabien, A.
    JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2019, 34 : 490 - 499
  • [10] Techno-economic and environmental assessment of CO2 conversion to methanol: Direct versus indirect conversion routes
    Haghighatjoo, Fatemeh
    Rahimpour, Mohammad Reza
    Farsi, Mohammad
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2023, 184