Is there a trade-off between human well-being and ecological footprint in European countries?

被引:4
作者
Robaina, Margarita [1 ,2 ]
Rodrigues, Sofia [1 ]
Madaleno, Mara [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Dept Econ Management Ind Engn & Tourism, Aveiro, Portugal
[2] GOVCOPP, Res Unit Governance Competitiveness & Publ Policy, Aveiro, Portugal
关键词
Human Development Index; Ecological Footprint; Sustainability; Trade-off; IFE; CCEMG; Sustainable Development Goals; European Countries; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; PANEL COINTEGRATION; KUZNETS CURVE; EMISSIONS; INDEX; ENVIRONMENT; GROWTH; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108296
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Human development, which encompasses aspects such as health, education, standard of living, and general wellbeing, is intrinsically linked to environmental sustainability. Studying the trade-off between these two aspects helps ensure that current needs are met without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The present study aims to understand whether there is a trade-off between the Ecological Footprint (EF) and the Human Development Index (HDI), using data from 42 European countries from 2006 to 2018. Other variables were also employed (Financial Development Index, Globalization Index, Human Freedom Index, Urban Population, Biocapacity, Renewable Energy) in two main models, through several econometric tests (Interactive Fixed Effects, Common Correlated Effect Mean Group). Other models were estimated for robustness checks. It is concluded that there is a trade-off between the EF and the HDI. This leads to problems when trying to achieve human well-being and environmental sustainability simultaneously. This study is innovative as the relationship between human development and environmental degradation has not been analyzed using these two variables for European countries. Understanding the relationship between human development and EF is fundamental to developing effective policies. It is important to adopt integrated approaches that consider social, economic, and environmental aspects.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 73 条
[41]   Economic prosperity, biodiversity conservation, and the environmental Kuznets curve [J].
Mills, Julianne H. ;
Waite, Thomas A. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (07) :2087-2095
[42]   Trade off between environment, energy consumption and human development: Do levels of economic development matter? [J].
Nguyen Van Tran ;
Quyet Van Tran ;
Linh Thi Thuy Do ;
Linh Hong Dinh ;
Ha Thi Thu Do .
ENERGY, 2019, 173 :483-493
[43]   The Relationship Between Environmental Degradation, Poverty and Human Quality in Indonesia [J].
Oktavilia, Shanty ;
Puspita, Dita Wahyu ;
Firmansyah ;
Sugiyanto, F. X. .
3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENTAL AND INFORMATION SYSTEM (ICENIS 2018), 2018, 73
[44]   The contribution of human development towards environmental sustainability [J].
Opoku, Eric Evans Osei ;
Dogah, Kingsley E. ;
Aluko, Olufemi Adewale .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 106
[45]   Energy consumption and human development: Evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model [J].
Ouedraogo, Nadia S. .
ENERGY, 2013, 63 :28-41
[46]   Are natural resources abundance and human development a solution for environmental pressure? Evidence from top ten countries with the largest ecological footprint [J].
Pata, Ugur Korkut ;
Aydin, Mucahit ;
Haouas, Ilham .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 70
[47]  
Pesaran M., 2004, CAMBRIDGE WORKING PA, DOI DOI 10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
[48]   A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence [J].
Pesaran, M. Hashem .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 22 (02) :265-312
[49]   Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure [J].
Pesaran, M. Hashem .
ECONOMETRICA, 2006, 74 (04) :967-1012
[50]   Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels [J].
Pesaran, M. Hashem .
ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2015, 34 (6-10) :1088-1116