A Quantitative Bias Analysis Approach to Informative Presence Bias in Electronic Health Records

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Hanxi [1 ]
Clark, Amy S. [2 ]
Hubbard, Rebecca A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, 423 Guardian Dr,826 Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Electronic health records; Informative visit process; Misclassification; Quantitative bias analysis; CARE UTILIZATION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1097/EDE.0000000000001714
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Accurate outcome and exposure ascertainment in electronic health record (EHR) data, referred to as EHR phenotyping, relies on the completeness and accuracy of EHR data for each individual. However, some individuals, such as those with a greater comorbidity burden, visit the health care system more frequently and thus have more complete data, compared with others. Ignoring such dependence of exposure and outcome misclassification on visit frequency can bias estimates of associations in EHR analysis. We developed a framework for describing the structure of outcome and exposure misclassification due to informative visit processes in EHR data and assessed the utility of a quantitative bias analysis approach to adjusting for bias induced by informative visit patterns. Using simulations, we found that this method produced unbiased estimates across all informative visit structures, if the phenotype sensitivity and specificity were correctly specified. We applied this method in an example where the association between diabetes and progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer patients may be subject to informative presence bias. The quantitative bias analysis approach allowed us to evaluate robustness of results to informative presence bias and indicated that findings were unlikely to change across a range of plausible values for phenotype sensitivity and specificity. Researchers using EHR data should carefully consider the informative visit structure reflected in their data and use appropriate approaches such as the quantitative bias analysis approach described here to evaluate robustness of study findings.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 358
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measurement Error and Misclassification in Electronic Medical Records: Methods to Mitigate Bias
    Young, Jessica C.
    Conover, Mitchell M.
    Funk, Michele Jonsson
    CURRENT EPIDEMIOLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 5 (04) : 343 - 356
  • [32] Unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized studies: quantitative bias analysis in health technology assessment
    Leahy, Thomas P.
    Kent, Seamus
    Sammon, Cormac
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Grieve, Richard
    Ramagopalan, Sreeram
    Gomes, Manuel
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (12) : 851 - 859
  • [33] A fuzzy approach to fault diagnosis in the presence of sensor bias
    Lee, PS
    Dexter, AL
    10TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3: MEETING THE GRAND CHALLENGE: MACHINES THAT SERVE PEOPLE, 2001, : 1585 - 1588
  • [34] Bias analysis of MUSIC in the presence of mutual coupling
    Liu, Z. M.
    Huang, Z. T.
    Zhou, Y. Y.
    IET SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2009, 3 (01) : 74 - 84
  • [35] Missing covariates in longitudinal data with informative dropouts: Bias analysis and inference
    Roy, J
    Lin, XH
    BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (03) : 837 - 846
  • [36] Quantitative bias analysis for external comparator studies
    Gray, Christen M.
    Grimson, Fiona
    Layton, Deborah
    Kim, Joseph
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 373 - 374
  • [37] Epic Bias: Institutionalization of Racism in the Electronic Health Record
    Taneja, Sonia
    Dholakia, Ayesha
    Sundaresan, Janani
    PEDIATRICS, 2022, 149 (01)
  • [38] Core Concepts in Pharmacoepidemiology: Quantitative Bias Analysis
    Brown, Jeremy P.
    Hunnicutt, Jacob N.
    Ali, M. Sanni
    Bhaskaran, Krishnan
    Cole, Ashley
    Langan, Sinead M.
    Nitsch, Dorothea
    Rentsch, Christopher T.
    Galwey, Nicholas W.
    Wing, Kevin
    Douglas, Ian J.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2024, 33 (10)
  • [39] Applying Quantitative Bias Analysis to Epidemiologic Data
    Bedogni, Giorgio
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2011, 174 : 511 - 512
  • [40] Quantitative bias analysis for study and grant planning
    Fox, Matthew P.
    Lash, Timothy L.
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 43 : 32 - 36