Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frames with and without Masonry Infill Walls: Experimental and Numerical Models

被引:2
|
作者
Zhu, Ruizhao [1 ]
Guo, Tong [1 ]
Song, Lianglong [2 ]
Yang, Kun [3 ]
Xu, Gang [3 ]
Tesfamariam, Solomon [4 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Concrete & Prestressed Concrete Struct, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[3] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 200 Univ Ave, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Masonry infill wall (MIW); Self-centering; Prestressed concrete frame; Quasi-static test; Vulnerability; Mainshock-aftershock; INCLUDING RESIDUAL DEFORMATIONS; PERFORMANCE; CONNECTION; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13207
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Interaction between masonry infill walls (MIWs) and a main structural system can impact the overall structural performance. However, there is no test to investigate the impact of MIWs on self-centering prestressed concrete (SCPC) frames, nor has there been a probabilistic performance evaluation considering the coupling effects of peak interstory drift ratio (PIDR) and residual interstory drift ratio (RIDR). This study compares the seismic performance of SCPC frames with and without MIWs through quasi-static tests and seismic risk assessment under mainshock-aftershock (MSAS) sequences. To begin, quasi-static tests on one-story SCPC frames with and without MIWs are performed to assess their seismic performance. A numerical simulation method for the SCPC frame with MIWs is then proposed and validated. Following that, the seismic performance of four multistory SCPC frames with and without MIWs is investigated under MSAS sequences at the maximum considered earthquake level. Finally, the seismic vulnerability assessment, considering the coupling effect of PIDR and RIDR under MSAS sequences, is conducted. The results indicate that cracks on the MIW present diagonal stepped cracks, and the MIW does not cause damage to the SCPC frame. When the MIW is damaged, the RIDR of the SCPC-MIW frame increases significantly; when the crack development is stable, the RIDR increases slowly as the interstory drift increases but remains at a very low level. Besides, when the MIW is damaged, an obvious deformation concentration effect occurs on the SCPC-MIW frame. The SCPC-MIW frame has a lower probability of exceeding the immediate occupancy level P(IO) than the SCPC frame, but it has a higher probability of exceeding the repairable level P(RE) when the seismic intensity is relatively small. Overall, the P(IO) and P(RE) of the SCPC and SCPC-MIW frames are higher under MSAS sequences than under MS-only sequences, except for the SCPC25 frame.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Seismic performance of SMA-prestressed self-centering beam-column joints: Experimental and numerical study
    Feng, Yutao
    Li, Weibin
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2025, 226
  • [42] Comparison of web plate numerical models for self-centering steel plate shear walls
    Clayton, Patricia M.
    Tsai, Ching-Yi
    Berman, Jeffrey W.
    Lowes, Laura N.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2015, 44 (12) : 2093 - 2110
  • [43] Shake-Table Tests and Numerical Analysis of Self-Centering Prestressed Concrete Frame
    Guo, Tong
    Hao, Yaowen
    Song, Lianglong
    Cao, Zhiliang
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2019, 116 (03) : 3 - 17
  • [44] Assessment of the seismic behavior of self-centering eccentrically braced frames with vertical link-beam
    Rofooei, Fayaz R.
    Soleimani, Mona
    STRUCTURES, 2023, 48 : 1285 - 1305
  • [45] NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SELF-CENTERING PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTION WITH WEB FRICTION DEVICES
    Song, Lianglong
    Guo, Tong
    INNOVATION & SUSTAINABILITY OF STRUCTURES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 816 - 821
  • [46] Seismic behavior of self-centering prestressed precast concrete frame subassembly using steel top and seat angles
    Cai, Xiaoning
    Gong, Nina
    Fu, C. C.
    Zhu, Yazhi
    Wu, Jiangchuan
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 229
  • [47] Seismic demand models and performance evaluation of self-centering and conventional concentrically braced frames
    Dyanati, Mojtaba
    Huang, Qindan
    Roke, David
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 84 : 368 - 381
  • [48] Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Prestressed Prefabricated Self-Centering IMS Composite Frame Joints
    Chen, Hongyu
    Zhu, Hongguang
    Yang, Yaowen
    Kang, Xiandong
    Wang, Fei
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 149 (09)
  • [49] Experimental and numerical study of a self-centering prestressed concrete moment resisting frame connection with bolted web friction devices
    Song, Liang-long
    Guo, Tong
    Chen, Cheng
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (04) : 529 - 545
  • [50] Assessment of Seismic Capacity for Reinforced Concrete Frames with Perforated Unreinforced Brick Masonry Infill Wall
    Umar, Muhammad
    Shah, Syed Azmat Ali
    Shahzada, Khan
    Naqash, Muhammad Tayyab
    Ali, Wajid
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2020, 6 (12): : 2397 - 2415