Exploring ChatGPT's Ability to Classify the Structure of Literature Reviews in Engineering Research Articles

被引:0
作者
Issa, Maha [1 ,2 ]
Faraj, Marwa [1 ]
AbiGhannam, Niveen [3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Beirut 11072020, Lebanon
[2] Santa Clara Univ, Santa Clara, CA 95053 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES | 2024年 / 17卷
关键词
ChatGPT; classification; engineering research articles; literature review; strategies; structural moves;
D O I
10.1109/TLT.2024.3409514
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
ChatGPT is a newly emerging artificial intelligence (AI) tool that can generate and assess written text. In this study, we aim to examine the extent to which it can correctly identify the structure of literature review sections in engineering research articles. For this purpose, we conducted a manual content analysis by classifying paragraphs of literature review sections into their corresponding categories that are based on Kwan's model, which is a labeling scheme for structuring literature reviews. We then asked ChatGPT to perform the same categorization and compared both outcomes. Numerical results do not imply a satisfactory performance of ChatGPT; therefore, writers cannot fully depend on it to edit their literature reviews. However, the AI chatbot displays an understanding of the given prompt and is able to respond beyond the classification task by giving supportive and useful explanations for the users. Such findings can be especially helpful for beginners who usually struggle to write comprehensive literature review sections since they highlight how users can benefit from this AI chatbot to revise their drafts at the level of content and organization. With further investigations and advancement, AI chatbots can also be used for teaching proper literature review writing and editing.
引用
收藏
页码:1859 / 1868
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] Kumar AHS, 2023, BEMS Rep, V9, P24, DOI DOI 10.5530/BEMS.9.1.5
  • [22] Kung TH, 2023, PLOS DIGIT HEALTH, V2, DOI 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
  • [23] The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics
    Kwan, BSC
    [J]. ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 2006, 25 (01) : 30 - 55
  • [24] "Weaving tales of resilience": cyborg composing with AI
    Li, Ruth
    [J]. ENGLISH TEACHING-PRACTICE AND CRITIQUE, 2024, 23 (01) : 57 - 66
  • [25] What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature
    Lo, Chung Kwan
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [26] Rasul T., 2023, Journal of Applied Learning Teaching, V6, P41, DOI [10.37074/jalt, DOI 10.37074/JALT.2023.6.1.29, 10.37074/JALT.2023.6.1.29]
  • [27] Ray Partha Pratim, 2023, INTERNET THINGS CYBE, V3, P121, DOI [10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003, DOI 10.1016/J.IOTCPS.2023.04.003]
  • [28] The advantages and limitations of using ChatGPT to enhance technological research
    Rice, Stephen
    Crouse, Sean R.
    Winter, Scott R.
    Rice, Connor
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2024, 76
  • [29] Robert Nancy, 2019, Nurs Manage, V50, P30, DOI 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000578988.56622.21
  • [30] Sastry MKS, 2013, IEEE INT PROF COMMUN