Patient experience of emergency department triage: An integrative review

被引:7
作者
Janerka, Carrie [1 ,2 ]
Leslie, Gavin D. [1 ]
Gill, Fenella J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Nursing, Kent St, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
[2] Fiona Stanley Hosp, South Metropolitan Hlth Serv, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Perth Childrens Hosp, Child & Adolescent Hlth Serv, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Triage; Emergency departments; Waiting rooms; Patient preference; Patient -centred care; Review; SATISFACTION; CARE; PROVIDER; QUALITY; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101456
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Emergency department (ED) triage is often patients' first contact with a health service and a critical point for patient experience. This review aimed to understand patient experience of ED triage and the waiting room. Methods: A systematic six -stage approach guided the integrative review. Medline, CINAHL, EmCare, Scopus, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and JBI database were systematically searched for primary research published between 2000-2022 that reported patient experience of ED triage and/or waiting room. Quality was assessed using established critical appraisal tools. Data were analysed for descriptive statistics and themes using the constant comparison method. Results: Twenty-nine articles were included. Studies were mostly observational (n = 17), conducted at a single site (n = 23), and involved low -moderate acuity patients (n = 13). Nine interventions were identified. Five themes emerged: 'the who, what and how of triage', 'the patient as a person', 'to know or not to know', 'the waiting game', and 'to leave or not to leave'. Conclusion: Wait times, initiation of assessment and treatment, information provision and interactions with triage staff appeared to have the most impact on patient experience, though patients' desires for each varied. A personcentred approach to triage is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[31]   The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers [J].
Hong, Quan Nha ;
Fabregues, Sergi ;
Bartlett, Gillian ;
Boardman, Felicity ;
Cargo, Margaret ;
Dagenais, Pierre ;
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre ;
Griffiths, Frances ;
Nicolau, Belinda ;
O'Cathain, Alicia ;
Rousseau, Marie-Claude ;
Vedel, Isabelle ;
Pluye, Pierre .
EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION, 2018, 34 (04) :285-291
[32]   Development of patient-centred care in acute hospital settings: A meta-narrative review [J].
Janerka, Carrie ;
Leslie, Gavin D. ;
Gill, Fenella J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2023, 140
[33]  
Joanna Briggs Institute, Critical appraisal tools
[34]   Review article: Has the implementation of time-based targets for emergency department length of stay influenced the quality of care for patients? A systematic review of quantitative literature [J].
Jones, Peter ;
Haustead, Daniel ;
Walker, Katie ;
Honan, Bridget ;
Gangathimmaiah, Vinay ;
Mitchell, Robert ;
Bissett, Ian ;
Forero, Roberto ;
Martini, Ella ;
Mountain, David .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2021, 33 (03) :398-408
[35]   Emergency department waiting room: Many requests, many insured and many primary care physician referrals [J].
Kamali M.F. ;
Jain M. ;
Jain A.R. ;
Schneider S.M. .
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 6 (1)
[36]  
Landon J, 2008, M.A.
[37]  
Lee Geraldine, 2006, Accid Emerg Nurs, V14, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.11.004
[38]  
Lowe DJ., 2018, BMJ Open Qual, V7
[39]   Setting wait times to achieve targeted left-without-being-seen rates [J].
Lucas, Jared ;
Batt, Robert J. ;
Soremekun, Olanrewaju A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 32 (04) :342-345
[40]  
Luo D., 2021, Ph.D.