The cloak of equality in STEM education: institutionalised masking of gender differences in STEM expectations, task values, and participation

被引:1
作者
Gottlieb, Jessica J. [1 ]
Wiseman, Alexander W. [1 ]
Hite, Rebecca [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Educ Psychol Leadership & Counseling, Box 41071, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Lubbock, TX USA
关键词
Gender inequality; educational equity; STEM education; TIMSS; 2015; ACHIEVEMENT; MATHEMATICS; 9TH-GRADE; STUDENTS; SCIENCE; SYSTEMS; MODELS; SCHOOL; BLACK;
D O I
10.1080/03057925.2024.2370293
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Do gender parity and egalitarian values in STEM education mask institutionalised gender inequalities in STEM? This study uses student background questionnaire data from the 2015 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) supplemented by national level data on gender parity in educational enrolment and female participation in the STEM workforce from the United Nations and International Labor Organization to empirically examine the evidence. Using two-level hierarchical linear models, we analyse the effects of students' STEM expectancies and task values on their anticipated STEM education and career participation. Results confirm that gender equity and egalitarian values dominate the cross-national expectancies and task values for STEM education, both across genders as well as for female and male students separately, even though there is wide variation and significant gendered inequality that persists in both educational access and STEM workforce participation. Thus, the 'cloak of equality' hypothesis is supported by the evidence presented.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Expectancy-Value Models for the STEM Persistence Plans of Ninth-Grade, High-Ability Students: A Comparison Between Black, Hispanic, and White Students [J].
Andersen, Lori ;
Ward, Thomas J. .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2014, 98 (02) :216-242
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The world's women 2015: trends and statistics, DOI 10.18356/82dd7ab9-en
[3]  
Baker D. P., 2005, National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling
[4]  
Baker DP, 2009, INT PERSP EDUC SOC, V10, P1, DOI 10.1108/S1479-3679(2009)0000010015
[5]  
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI, DOI [10.1891/08898391.13.2.158, DOI 10.1891/08898391.13.2.158]
[6]  
Benschop Y., 1996, De Mantel Der Gelijkheid, Gender in Organisaties
[7]   What Is STEM? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships [J].
Breiner, Jonathan M. ;
Harkness, Shelly Sheats ;
Johnson, Carla C. ;
Koehler, Catherine M. .
SCHOOL SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS, 2012, 112 (01) :3-11
[8]   Problematizing the STEM Pipeline Metaphor: Is the STEM Pipeline Metaphor Serving Our Students and the STEM Workforce? [J].
Cannady, Matthew A. ;
Greenwald, Eric ;
Harris, Kimberly N. .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2014, 98 (03) :443-460
[9]   Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries [J].
Charles, Maria ;
Bradley, Karen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2009, 114 (04) :924-976
[10]   Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls' interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes [J].
Cheryan, Sapna ;
Master, Allison ;
Meltzoff, Andrew N. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6