Enhancing drought resilience and vulnerability assessment in small farms: A global expert survey on multidimensional indicators

被引:3
作者
Sass, Karina Simone [1 ]
Konak, Abdullah [2 ]
de Macedo, Marina Batalini [3 ]
Benso, Marcos Roberto [4 ]
Shrimpton, Elisabeth [5 ]
Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye [5 ]
Sarmah, Tanaya [5 ]
Mendiondo, Eduardo Mario [4 ]
Silva, Greicelene Jesus da [4 ]
da Silva, Pedro Gustavo Camara [4 ]
Nardocci, Adelaide Cassia [1 ]
Jacobson, Michael [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Publ Hlth, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Penn State Univ Berks, Informat Sci & Technol, Reading, PA USA
[3] Univ Cesumar Brazil, Maringa, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Cranfield Univ, Sch Water Energy & Environm, Cranfield, England
[6] Penn State Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Management, University Pk, PA USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 巴西圣保罗研究基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Drought risk management; Drought vulnerability; Drought resilience; Expert elicitation; Small farms; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SMALLHOLDER; RISK; COLLABORATION; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104616
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The purpose of the paper is to evaluate drought vulnerability and resilience within the context of small-scale farms. Small-scale farms are distinguished by their family-oriented motives, which prioritize maintaining the stability of the household farm system. This type of farming is responsible for a significant part of the world's food production, thus identifying their vulnerability and resilience to drought is essential to avoid adverse socioeconomic impacts. The paper contributes to this issue by presenting the findings of a comprehensive global survey conducted among experts on drought risk analysis, focusing on indicators related to drought resilience and vulnerability in small-scale farming. An online questionnaire was sent to experts asking them to rate a list of 36 indicators in terms of five metrics: relevancy, accessibility, objectivity, understanding, and temporal consistency. Each indicator was rated on a three-point scale (low, medium, and high). The survey was entirely completed by 120 experts from 42 countries and different areas of expertise. The survey results offer a comprehensive evaluation of multiple indicators, contributing to future research by guiding the selection of indicators for composite drought resilience indexes and enhancing the understanding of farmers' and food systems' climate resilience. The survey results indicate that: i) government and institutional indicators are very relevant for drought resilience assessment; ii) there is an undefined role for social indicators in drought vulnerability assessment; iii) experts still do not perceive the importance of local engagement in drought risk management; iv) the use of relevant indicators in drought risk assessment can be limited because of a lack of accessibility and temporal consistency.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] A Guide to Integrating Expert Opinion and Fuzzy AHP When Generating Weights for Composite Indices
    Al Fozaie, Mohammad Tariq
    Wahid, Hairunnizam
    [J]. ADVANCES IN FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 2022
  • [2] Alonso C, 2019, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V19, P2727, DOI [10.5194/nhess-19-2727-2019, 10.5194/nhess-19-2727-2019,2019]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V30, P9
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, Econ. Polit. Wkly.
  • [5] Mapping the vulnerability of crop production to drought in Ghana using rainfall, yield and socioeconomic data
    Antwi-Agyei, Philip
    Fraser, Evan D. G.
    Dougill, Andrew J.
    Stringer, Lindsay C.
    Simelton, Elisabeth
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 32 (02) : 324 - 334
  • [6] Drying Climates and Gendered Suffering: Links Between Drought, Food Insecurity, and Women's HIV in Less-Developed Countries
    Austin, Kelly F.
    Noble, Mark D.
    Berndt, Virginia Kuulei
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2021, 154 (01) : 313 - 334
  • [7] Drought indicators revisited: the need for a wider consideration of environment and society
    Bachmair, Sophie
    Stahl, Kerstin
    Collins, Kevin
    Hannaford, Jamie
    Acreman, Mike
    Svoboda, Mark
    Knutson, Cody
    Smith, Kelly Helm
    Wall, Nicole
    Fuchs, Brian
    Crossman, Neville D.
    Overton, Ian C.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2016, 3 (04): : 516 - 536
  • [8] Selection Bias in Web Surveys
    Bethlehem, Jelke
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2010, 78 (02) : 161 - 188
  • [9] The triple complexity of drought risk analysis and its visualisation via mapping: a review across scales and sectors
    Blauhut, Veit
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2020, 210
  • [10] The health and well-being effects of drought: assessing multi-stakeholder perspectives through narratives from the UK
    Bryan, Kimberly
    Ward, Sarah
    Roberts, Liz
    White, Mathew P.
    Landeg, Owen
    Taylor, Tim
    McEwen, Lindsey
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (04) : 2073 - 2095