Conceptual engineering and the dynamics of linguistic intervention

被引:0
作者
Gibbons, Adam F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lingnan Univ, Hong Kong Catastroph Risk Ctr, Dept Philosophy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Lingnan Univ, Dept Philosophy, HSH 215, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY | 2024年
关键词
Concepts; conceptual engineering; the implementation problem; linguistic intervention; unintended consequences;
D O I
10.1080/0020174X.2024.2367251
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Implementation Problem for conceptual engineering is, roughly, the problem conceptual engineers face when attempting to bring about the conceptual change they support. An important aspect of this problem concerns the extent to which attempting to implement concepts can lead to unintended negative consequences. Not only can conceptual engineers fail to implement their proposals, but their interventions can produce outcomes directly counter to their goals. It is therefore important to think carefully about the prospect of attempted implementation leading to unintended negative consequences: what sort of negative consequences can conceptual engineers expect? Are some forms of conceptual engineering more likely than others to lead to such consequences? And is conceptual engineering still viable even given the risk of such consequences? This paper addresses such questions. I begin by outlining different forms of conceptual engineering (Section 2), before examining how they can produce unintended negative consequences (Section 3). I then discuss some implications of the fact that attempted implementation can produce unintended negative consequences, suggesting that, among other things, some forms of conceptual engineering are less viable than others (Section 4). I conclude, though, by considering some of the ways in which conceptual engineering is nonetheless a worthwhile pursuit (Section 5).
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Conceptual engineering is extremely unlikely to work. So what?
    Andow, James
    [J]. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 64 (1-2): : 212 - 226
  • [2] Conceptual Engineering Between Representational Skepticism and Complacency: Is There a Third Way?
    Belleri, Delia
    [J]. TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 42 (04): : 1051 - 1062
  • [3] Benkler Y., 2018, NETWORK PROPAGANDA M
  • [4] Bermdez J. L., 2017, Inside Higher Ed
  • [5] Brown E., 2019, J Ethics Soc Philos, V16, P144
  • [6] Brown E., 2021, ROUTLEDGE HDB POLITI, P214, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780429326769-26
  • [7] Disability studies, conceptual engineering, and conceptual activism
    Cantalamessa, Elizabeth Amber
    [J]. INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 64 (1-2): : 46 - 75
  • [8] Cappelen H., 2018, FIXING LANGUAGE ESSA
  • [9] Cappelen H., 2020, CONCEPTUAL ENG CONCE, P1, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780198801856.003.0001]
  • [10] Cappelen Herman., 2020, CONCEPTUAL ENG CONCE, P435, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780198801856.003.0021, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780198801856.003.0021]