Why does organizational justice matter? Uncertainty management among law enforcement officers

被引:41
作者
Wolfe, Scott E. [1 ]
Rojek, Jeff [2 ]
Manjarrez, Victor M., Jr. [2 ]
Rojek, Allison [3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Sch Criminal Justice, 655 Auditorium Dr,Baker Hall,Room 510, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Texas El Paso, Ctr Law & Human Behav, Prospect Hall,Room 208,500 W Univ Ave, El Paso, TX 79968 USA
[3] Univ Texas El Paso, Dept Criminal Jusetice, Educ Bldg,Suite 500,500 W Univ Ave, El Paso, TX 79968 USA
关键词
Organizational justice; Uncertainty management; Fairness heuristic; Employee job satisfaction; Negative publicity; Law enforcement; Police; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; POLICE CULTURE; EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; WORKPLACE DEVIANCE; JOB STRESSORS; UNIT-LEVEL; FAIRNESS; SELF; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.11.003
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Purpose: Law enforcement officers who believe their supervisors are organizationally fair are more satisfied with their jobs, more confident in their authority, and more likely to use procedural justice. The problem, however, is that we have little understanding concerning why officers care about being treated fairly. We address this issue by drawing on fairness heuristic and uncertainty management theories. Methods: We used survey data from a sample of Border Patrol agents (N = 868) to help advance our understanding of the association between organizational justice and job satisfaction. Regression analyses and Stata's margins command were used to visualize the interaction effects. Results: We found that agents facing uncertainty focused more attention on fair supervisor treatment than their counterparts when considering how satisfied they were with their jobs. Both general workplace uncertainty and uncertainty stemming from recent negative publicity moderated the relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction. Conclusions: Organizational justice appears to be more salient to agents facing uncertainty because supervisor fairness provides cues that the agency has their best interests in mind and will support them in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 29
页数:10
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[3]   The Role of Overall Justice Judgments in Organizational Justice Research: A Test of Mediation [J].
Ambrose, Maureen L. ;
Schminke, Marshall .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (02) :491-500
[4]  
Andreas P., 2009, BORDER GAMES POLICIN, V2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CRIME JUSTICE SOCIAL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1979, POLICE STREETCORNER
[7]  
BAHN C, 1984, J POLICE SCI ADMIN, V12, P390
[8]   Sleep and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction [J].
Barnes, Christopher M. ;
Ghumman, Sonia ;
Scott, Brent A. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 18 (01) :16-26
[9]   Main and moderating effects of self-control, organizational justice, and emotional labour on counterproductive behaviour at work [J].
Bechtoldt, Myriam N. ;
Welk, Conny ;
Hartig, Johannes ;
Zapf, Dieter .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 16 (04) :479-500
[10]  
Bies R.J., 1986, RES NEGOTIATIONS ORG, V1, P43, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.TB02581.X