Energy efficiency and production technology heterogeneity in China's agricultural sector: A meta-frontier approach

被引:141
作者
Fei, Rilong [1 ]
Lin, Boqiang [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Econ, China Ctr Energy Econ Res, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Minjiang Univ, Newhuadu Business Sch, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, China Inst Studies Energy Policy, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Energy Econ & Energy Polic, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Agricultural sector; Meta-frontier DEA; Malmquist index approach; Energy efficiency; Technological heterogeneity; MEASURING ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; CO2; EMISSIONS; REGIONAL ECONOMIES; TECHNICAL PROGRESS; DECOMPOSITION; CONSUMPTION; GROWTH; OUTPUT; INDEX; GAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Following agricultural technological heterogeneity, we employ the meta-frontier DEA method to measure agricultural energy efficiency in China's agricultural sector, and then use Malmquist index approach to explore the energy productivity change. The results show that agricultural energy efficiency is quite low and has the characteristics of regional differences. The energy efficiency of eastern coastal regions is significantly higher than that of the western interior. The energy efficiency loss comes mainly from managerial inefficiency rather than technology gap on the whole. The Malmquist index reveals that agricultural energy productivity has improved in general, mainly due to technological advancements while the deterioration in agricultural energy productivity is due to reduction in technical efficiency. We suggest that technological innovation and managerial efficiency should be promoted to increase energy efficiency and more attention should be paid to the western region to balance the regional difference. The findings are of great significance to energy conservation and sustainable development in China's agricultural sector. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 34
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation [J].
Ang, BW ;
Liu, FL .
ENERGY, 2001, 26 (06) :537-548
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1973, J ECON HIST, DOI DOI 10.1017/S002205070007683X
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, INDEX NUMBERS ESSAYS
[4]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY EC
[5]  
Battese G. E., 2004, METAFRONTIER PRODUCT
[6]  
Battese GE., 2002, International Journal of Business and Economics, V1, P87, DOI DOI 10.1023/B:PR0D.0000012454.06094.29
[7]  
Boyd GA, 2008, ENERG J, V29, P23
[8]   MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS [J].
CAVES, DW ;
CHRISTENSEN, LR ;
DIEWERT, WE .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1982, 92 (365) :73-86
[9]  
Chambers RobertG., 1996, PAC ECON REV, V1, P181, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0106.1996.TB00184.X
[10]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444