Assessment of Factors Influencing Educational Effectiveness in Higher Educational Institutions

被引:2
作者
Vasilev, Yurii [1 ]
Vasileva, Polina [2 ]
Batova, Olga [3 ]
Tsvetkova, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Empress Catherine II St Petersburg Min Univ, Dept Org & Management, 2,21st Line, St Petersburg 199106, Russia
[2] St Petersburg State Univ, Dept Foreign Language, St Petersburg 199034, Russia
[3] Empress Catherine II St Petersburg Min Univ, Dept Ind Econ, 2,21st Line, St Petersburg 199106, Russia
关键词
education; effectiveness; efficiency; factors; quality; higher education; PETERSBURG MINING UNIVERSITY; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.3390/su16124886
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the results of the study of educational effectiveness at the tertiary level. It contains an overview of the research considering the quality and effectiveness of higher education development, the issues of creating criteria for their assessment and measurement. The four groups of factors ("Man", "Milieu", "Material", "Method") for evaluating educational effectiveness were determined, totally including 65 points. The results of the students' surveys revealed the most significant factors as well as the least crucial ones influencing educational effectiveness in higher educational institutions. The total number of respondents was 279. It was found that the subgroup of factors "Teacher's competence" is the most important from the viewpoint of the respondents, while the subgroup "Infrastructure facilities" is the least valuable one. The priority measures list was given, the implementation of which will make it possible to increase educational effectiveness in higher educational institutions. Methods such as Ishikawa diagram building, brainstorming and the survey of students were used for achieving the objectives of this research.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Management of Higher Education Institutions and the Evaluation of their Efficiency and Performance
    Tommaso Agasisti
    [J]. Tertiary Education and Management, 2017, 23 (3) : 187 - 190
  • [2] Challenges and Opportunities for Russian Higher Education amid COVID-19: Teachers' Perspective
    Almazova, Nadezhda
    Krylova, Elena
    Rubtsova, Anna
    Odinokaya, Maria
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (12): : 1 - 11
  • [3] Administrative Processes Efficiency Measurement in Higher Education Institutions: A Scoping Review
    Alvarez-Sandez, Dulce
    Velazquez-Victorica, Karla
    Mungaray-Moctezuma, Alejandro
    Lopez-Guerrero, Aida
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [4] Lean Six Sigma journey in a UK higher education institute: a case study
    Antony, Jiju
    Ghadge, Abhijeet
    Ashby, Stephanie A.
    Cudney, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 35 (02) : 510 - 526
  • [5] Employing Industrial Quality Management Systems for Quality Assurance in Outcome-Based Engineering Education: A Review
    Bin Rais, Rao Naveed
    Rashid, Muhammad
    Zakria, Muaaz
    Hussain, Sajjad
    Qadir, Junaid
    Imran, Muhammad A.
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 24
  • [6] To the Origins of Humanitarian Education at the Saint-Petersburg Mining University
    Bondareva, Olga N.
    Egorenkova, Natalia A.
    Shchukina, Daria A.
    [J]. VOPROSY ISTORII, 2021, 12 (03) : 89 - 101
  • [7] A QUEST FOR WASTE REDUCTION AT INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING: INVESTIGATING THE INTEGRATION OF SIX SIGMA AND LEAN SIX SIGMA METHODOLOGIES WITH TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
    Brits, H. J.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 32 (04) : 37 - 50
  • [8] Deming W.E., 2000, OUT CRISIS
  • [9] Dorofeev DY, 2023, J MIN INST, V263, P674
  • [10] Student-Centered Assessment Research on Holographic Learning Paradigm Based on Intelligent Analytic Hierarchy Process in Teaching of Bridge Engineering Course
    Duan, Maojun
    Dong, Fenghui
    Wang, Jiaqing
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (06)