Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment

被引:2
作者
Soleimani, Ghazaleh [1 ]
Towhidkhah, Farzad [1 ]
Saviz, Mehrdad [1 ]
Ekhtiari, Hamed [2 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Fac Biomed Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Laureate Inst Brain Res, Tulsa, OK USA
关键词
tDCS; Individual differences; Cortical morphology; Computational head models; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Substance use disorder; SURFACE-BASED ANALYSIS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ELECTRIC-FIELD; ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN; TDCS; MOTOR; THICKNESS; REGIONS;
D O I
10.32598/bcn.2021.3400.1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied as an adjunctive treatment option for substance use disorders (SUDs). Alterations in brain structure following SUD may change tDCS-induced electric field (EF) and subsequent responses; however, grouplevel differences between healthy controls (HC) and participants with SUDs in terms of EF and its association with cortical architecture have not yet been modeled quantitatively. This study provides a methodology for group-level analysis of computational head models to investigate the influence of cortical morphology metrics on EFs. Methods: Whole-brain surface-based morphology was conducted, and cortical thickness, volume, and surface area were compared between participants with cannabis use disorders (CUD) (n=20) and age-matched HC (n=22). Meanwhile, EFs were simulated for bilateral tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The effects of structural alterations on EF distribution were investigated based on individualized computational head models. Results: Regarding EF, no significant difference was found within the prefrontal cortex; however, EFs were significantly different in left-postcentral and right-superior temporal gyrus (P<0.05) with higher levels of variance in CUD compared to HC [F-(39,F- 43)=5.31, P<0.0001, C=0.95]. Significant differences were observed in cortical area (caudal anterior cingulate and rostral middle frontal), thickness (lateral orbitofrontal), and volume (paracentral and fusiform) between the two groups. Conclusion: Brain morphology and tDCS-induced EFs may be changed following CUD; however, differences between CUD and HCs in EFs do not always overlap with brain areas that show structural alterations. To sufficiently modulate stimulation targets, whether individuals with CUD need different stimulation doses based on tDCS target location should be checked.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 662
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Computational Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Bikson, Marom
    Rahman, Asif
    Datta, Abhishek
    [J]. CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 43 (03) : 176 - 183
  • [22] Mechanisms and Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Giordano, James
    Bikson, Marom
    Kappenman, Emily S.
    Clark, Vincent P.
    Coslett, H. Branch
    Hamblin, Michael R.
    Hamilton, Roy
    Jankord, Ryan
    Kozumbo, Walter J.
    McKinley, R. Andrew
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Reilly, J. Patrick
    Richardson, Jessica
    Wurzman, Rachel
    Calabrese, Edward
    [J]. DOSE-RESPONSE, 2017, 15 (01):
  • [23] Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation attenuated symptoms of alcohol use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Hyun Joon
    Kang, Nyeonju
    [J]. PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 108
  • [24] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) elicits stimulus-specific enhancement of cortical plasticity
    Boroda, Elias
    Sponheim, Scott R.
    Fiecas, Mark
    Lim, Kelvin O.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2020, 211
  • [25] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation?
    Priori, Aberto
    Hallett, Mark
    Rothwell, John C.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2009, 2 (04) : 241 - 245
  • [26] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the functional coupling of the sensorimotor cortical network
    Vecchio, Fabrizio
    Pellicciari, Maria Concetta
    Miraglia, Francesca
    Brignani, Debora
    Miniussi, Carlo
    Rossini, Paolo Maria
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2016, 140 : 50 - 56
  • [27] Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the visual cortex in the prophylactic treatment of migraine
    Antal, Andrea
    Kriener, Naomi
    Lang, Nicolas
    Boros, Klara
    Paulus, Walter
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2011, 31 (07) : 820 - 828
  • [28] Transcranial direct current stimulation versus intermittent theta-burst stimulation for the improvement of working memory performance
    Razza, Lais B.
    Luethi, Matthias S.
    Zanao, Tamires
    De Smet, Stefanie
    Buchpiguel, Carlos
    Busatto, Geraldo
    Pereira, Juliana
    Klein, Izio
    Kappen, Mitchel
    Moreno, Marina
    Baeken, Chris
    Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [29] Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of fibromyalgia: a systematic review
    Deus-Yela, Joan
    Dolors Soler, M.
    Pelayo-Vergara, Raul
    Vidal-Samso, Joan
    [J]. REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2017, 65 (08) : 353 - 360