Barriers to Completing Low Dose Computed Tomography Scan for Lung Cancer Screening

被引:1
|
作者
Wong, Lye-Yeng [1 ]
Choudhary, Sania [1 ]
Kapula, Ntemena [1 ]
Lin, Margaret [2 ]
Elliott, Irmina A. [1 ]
Guenthart, Brandon A. [1 ]
Liou, Douglas Z. [1 ]
Backhus, Leah M. [1 ,3 ]
Berry, Mark F. [1 ]
Shrager, Joseph B. [1 ,3 ]
Lui, Natalie S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, 300 Pasteur Dr, Falk Bldg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
Screening scan; Shared decision-making; Barriers to screening; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Among those referred for lung cancer screening (LCS), studies show that 15-30% of patients do not complete low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and therefore lose out on the survival advantage that LCS offers. In our study, we found that the 13% of patients who did not complete LDCT were less likely to be married and more likely to be current smokers. Introduction: Annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening has been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality in high-risk individuals by detecting the disease at an earlier stage. This study aims to assess the barriers to completing LDCT in a cohort of patients who were determined eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS). Methods: We performed a single institution, mixed methods, cross-sectional study of patients who had a LDCT ordered from July to December 2022. We then completed phone surveys with patients who did not complete LDCT to assess knowledge, attitude, and perceptions toward LCS. Results: We identified 380 patients who met inclusion cr iter ia, including 331 (87%) who completed LDCT and 49 (13%) who did not. Patients who completed a LDCT and those who did not were similar regarding age, sex, race, primary language, household income, body mass index, median pack years, and quit time. Positive predictors of LDCT completion were: meeting USPSTF guidelines (97.9% vs 81.6%), being married (58.3% vs 44.9%), former versus current smokers (55% vs 41.7%), personal history of emphysema (60.4% vs 42.9%), and family history of lung cancer (13.9% vs 4.1%) (all P < .05). Of the patients who participated in the phone survey, only 7% of respondents thought they were high risk for developing lung cancer despite attending a shared decision-making visit and only 10% wanted to re-schedule their LDCT. Conclusion: There exist barriers to completing LDCT even after patients are identified as eligible and complete a shared decision-making visit secondary to knowledge barriers, misperceptions, and patient disinterest.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 430
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of a low-dose computed tomography screening programme for lung cancer in New Zealand
    Jaine, Richard
    Kvizhinadze, Giorgi
    Nair, Nisha
    Blakely, Tony
    LUNG CANCER, 2018, 124 : 233 - 240
  • [42] Lung cancer incidence in middle-aged men estimated by low-dose computed tomography screening
    Nojo, Takeshi
    Imanaka, Yuichi
    Ishizaki, Tatsuro
    Sekimoto, Miho
    Yoshino, Masahito
    Kurosawa, Takashi
    Takao, Hidemasa
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    LUNG CANCER, 2009, 65 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [43] Systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography
    Sadate, Alexandre
    Occean, Bob V.
    Beregi, Jean-Paul
    Hamard, Aymeric
    Addala, Takieddine
    de Forges, Helene
    Fabbro-Peray, Pascale
    Frandon, Julien
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 134 : 107 - 114
  • [44] Impact of Significant Coronary Artery Calcification Reported on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening
    Mendoza, Dexter P.
    Kako, Bashar
    Digumarthy, Subba R.
    Shepard, Jo-Anne O.
    Little, Brent P.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2020, 35 (02) : 129 - 135
  • [45] The challenges of implementing low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries
    Edelman Saul, Eduardo
    Guerra, Raquel B.
    Edelman Saul, Michelle
    Lopes da Silva, Laercio
    Aleixo, Gabriel F. P.
    Matuda, Raquel M. K.
    Lopes, Gilberto
    NATURE CANCER, 2020, 1 (12) : 1140 - 1152
  • [46] Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Early Detection of Lung Cancer
    Rulli, Kristi S.
    Matthews, Eric
    RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 92 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [47] Results of Initial Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening for Lung Cancer
    Church, Timothy R.
    Black, William C.
    Aberle, Denise R.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Clingan, Kathy L.
    Duan, Fenghai
    Fagerstrom, Richard M.
    Gareen, Ilana F.
    Gierada, David S.
    Jones, Gordon C.
    Mahon, Irene
    Marcus, Pamela M.
    Sicks, JoRean D.
    Jain, Amanda
    Baum, Sarah
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (21) : 1980 - 1991
  • [48] Does low-dose computed tomography screening improve lung cancer-related outcomes? -a systematic review
    Yu, Stephanie Wing Yin
    Leung, Ching See
    Tsz, Cho Ho
    Lee, Brian Tsz Yuen
    Chan, Hon Kwan
    Sihoe, Alan Dart Loon
    VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 5 : 1 - 13
  • [49] Identification of Candidates for Longer Lung Cancer Screening Intervals Following a Negative Low-Dose Computed Tomography Result
    Robbins, Hilary A.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Cheung, Li C.
    Chaturvedi, Anil K.
    Katki, Hormuzd A.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2019, 111 (09): : 996 - 999
  • [50] Balancing the Benefits and Harms of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: Medicare's Options for Coverage
    Wiener, Renda Soylemez
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 161 (06) : 445 - U107