Barriers to Completing Low Dose Computed Tomography Scan for Lung Cancer Screening

被引:1
|
作者
Wong, Lye-Yeng [1 ]
Choudhary, Sania [1 ]
Kapula, Ntemena [1 ]
Lin, Margaret [2 ]
Elliott, Irmina A. [1 ]
Guenthart, Brandon A. [1 ]
Liou, Douglas Z. [1 ]
Backhus, Leah M. [1 ,3 ]
Berry, Mark F. [1 ]
Shrager, Joseph B. [1 ,3 ]
Lui, Natalie S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, 300 Pasteur Dr, Falk Bldg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
Screening scan; Shared decision-making; Barriers to screening; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Among those referred for lung cancer screening (LCS), studies show that 15-30% of patients do not complete low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and therefore lose out on the survival advantage that LCS offers. In our study, we found that the 13% of patients who did not complete LDCT were less likely to be married and more likely to be current smokers. Introduction: Annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening has been shown to reduce lung cancer mortality in high-risk individuals by detecting the disease at an earlier stage. This study aims to assess the barriers to completing LDCT in a cohort of patients who were determined eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS). Methods: We performed a single institution, mixed methods, cross-sectional study of patients who had a LDCT ordered from July to December 2022. We then completed phone surveys with patients who did not complete LDCT to assess knowledge, attitude, and perceptions toward LCS. Results: We identified 380 patients who met inclusion cr iter ia, including 331 (87%) who completed LDCT and 49 (13%) who did not. Patients who completed a LDCT and those who did not were similar regarding age, sex, race, primary language, household income, body mass index, median pack years, and quit time. Positive predictors of LDCT completion were: meeting USPSTF guidelines (97.9% vs 81.6%), being married (58.3% vs 44.9%), former versus current smokers (55% vs 41.7%), personal history of emphysema (60.4% vs 42.9%), and family history of lung cancer (13.9% vs 4.1%) (all P < .05). Of the patients who participated in the phone survey, only 7% of respondents thought they were high risk for developing lung cancer despite attending a shared decision-making visit and only 10% wanted to re-schedule their LDCT. Conclusion: There exist barriers to completing LDCT even after patients are identified as eligible and complete a shared decision-making visit secondary to knowledge barriers, misperceptions, and patient disinterest.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 430
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal lung cancer screening intervals following a negative low-dose computed tomography result
    Reyes, Monica E.
    Schabath, Matthew B.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 : S1916 - S1918
  • [32] Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in Anhui, China: A randomized controlled trial
    Rong, Feng
    Shi, Rui
    Hu, Lili
    Chen, Ran
    Wang, Daoyue
    Lv, Xiazhi
    Zhao, Yong
    Huang, Wei
    Yang, Yang
    Zhou, Hongyang
    Hong, Kaige
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [33] China national lung cancer screening guideline with low-dose computed tomography (2015 version)
    Zhou, Qing-hua
    Fan, Ya-guang
    Bu, Hong
    Wang, Ying
    Wu, Ning
    Huang, Yun-chao
    Wang, Guiqi
    Wang, Xin-yun
    Qiao, You-lin
    THORACIC CANCER, 2015, 6 (06) : 812 - 818
  • [34] State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States
    Fedewa, Stacey A.
    Kazerooni, Ella A.
    Studts, Jamie L.
    Smith, Robert A.
    Bandi, Priti
    Sauer, Ann Goding
    Cotter, Megan
    Sineshaw, Helmneh M.
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Silvestri, Gerard A.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (08): : 1044 - 1052
  • [35] Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: Experiences from a tertiary hospital in Taiwan
    Chen, Chih-Yu
    Chen, Chia-Hung
    Shen, Te-Chun
    Cheng, Wen-Chien
    Hsu, Cheng-Nan
    Liao, Chun-Han
    Chen, Chih-Yi
    Hsia, Te-Chun
    Liao, Wei-Chih
    Tu, Chih-Yen
    Shih, Chuen-Ming
    Hsu, Wu-Huei
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 115 (03) : 163 - 170
  • [36] Diagnostic Performance of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer over Five Years
    Veronesi, Giulia
    Maisonneuve, Patrick
    Spaggiari, Lorenzo
    Rampinelli, Cristiano
    Pardolesi, Alessandro
    Bertolotti, Raffaella
    Filippi, Niccolo
    Bellomi, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9 (07) : 935 - 939
  • [37] Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography After the National Lung Screening Trial. The Debate is Still Open
    Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
    Perez Rios, Monica
    Fernandez-Villar, Alberto
    ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, 2013, 49 (04): : 158 - 165
  • [38] Radiation Exposure to Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening: Should We Be Concerned?
    Pozzessere, Chiara
    von Garnier, Christophe
    Beigelman-Aubry, Catherine
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 9 (01) : 166 - 177
  • [39] Nationwide lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: implementation and first results of the HUNCHEST screening program
    Kerpel-Fronius, Anna
    Monostori, Zsuzsanna
    Kovacs, Gabor
    Ostoros, Gyula
    Horvath, Istvan
    Solymosi, Diana
    Pipek, Orsolya
    Szatmari, Ferenc
    Kovacs, Anita
    Markoczy, Zsolt
    Rojko, Livia
    Renyi-Vamos, Ferenc
    Hoetzenecker, Konrad
    Bogos, Krisztina
    Megyesfalvi, Zsolt
    Dome, Balazs
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (07) : 4457 - 4467
  • [40] Cost-effectiveness of a low-dose computed tomography screening programme for lung cancer in New Zealand
    Jaine, Richard
    Kvizhinadze, Giorgi
    Nair, Nisha
    Blakely, Tony
    LUNG CANCER, 2020, 144 : 99 - 106