Euthanasia in detention and the ethics of caring solidarity: A case study of the 'Tarragona Gunman'

被引:0
作者
Espericueta, Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Philosophy 1, Filosofia1,Avda Hosp S-N, Granada 18071, Spain
关键词
aid-in-dying; assisted suicide; defendant; detention; euthanasia; medical assistance in dying; prison; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; PRISON MEDICINE; HEALTH-CARE; EQUIVALENCE; PRINCIPLE; RELEVANCE;
D O I
10.1111/bioe.13325
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Almost a year after the enactment of the law regulating euthanasia in Spain, public opinion was shocked to learn that a defendant in criminal proceedings obtained medical assistance in dying following injuries sustained in an exchange of gunfire with the police after having committed a series of severe crimes. Although there are very few cases in the world where prisoners have received euthanasia, the one we will discuss in this article is the only known case where both the public prosecutor's office and the private prosecutors judicially opposed the defendant's euthanasia. This article aims to offer a new perspective on the ethical legitimacy of detainees' access to euthanasia: the ethics of caring solidarity. To do this, we will first place the case in its legal context. Subsequently, we will address the two main arguments proposed in the literature to justify euthanasia in detention: respect for the autonomy of the detainee and the principle of equivalence of care. Finally, after having identified serious shortcomings in both arguments, we will argue that the perspective of caring solidarity offers a better ethical basis for people in detention's access to euthanasia.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 721
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Lucas-Torres C.
[2]  
Martens K.
[3]  
Snacken S., Devynck C., Distelmans W., Gutwirth S., Lemmens C., Demandes d'euthanasie dans les prisons belges. Entre souffrance psychique, dignité humaine et peine de mort, Criminologie, 48, 1, pp. 101-122, (2015)
[4]  
Anguera De Sojo I.
[5]  
Devolder K., Euthanasia for detainees in Belgium, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 25, 3, pp. 384-394, (2016)
[6]  
Duff R.A., Pre-Trial Detention and the Presumption of Innocence, pp. 115-132, (2013)
[7]  
Scharff P., Punishment without Conviction? Scandinavian Pre-Trial Practices and the Power of the “benevolent” State, pp. 129-155, (2017)
[8]  
Celik E.C., Erhan B., Lakse E., The clinical characteristics of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury, Spinal Cord, 50, pp. 585-589, (2012)
[9]  
Colloca L., Ludman T., Bouhassira D., Baron R., Dickenson A.H., Yarnitsky D., Freeman R., Truini A., Attal N., Finnerup N.B., Eccleston C., Kalso E., Bennett D.L., Dworkin R.H., Raja S.N., Neuropathic pain, Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 3, pp. 1-19, (2017)
[10]  
Burke D., Fullen B.M., Stokes D., Lennon O., Neuropathic pain prevalence following spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis, European Journal of Pain, 21, 1, pp. 29-44, (2016)