Early economic evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection in primary care

被引:0
|
作者
Merriel, Samuel William David [1 ,3 ]
Buttle, Peter [2 ]
Price, Sarah J. [3 ]
Burns-Cox, Nick [4 ]
Walter, Fiona M. [5 ]
Hamilton, William [3 ]
Spencer, Anne E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester, England
[2] Patient & Publ Involvement, Swindon, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Exeter, England
[4] Somerset NHS Fdn Trust, Taunton, England
[5] Queen Mary Univ London, London, England
来源
BJUI COMPASS | 2024年 / 5卷 / 09期
关键词
bpMRI; diagnosis; early economic evaluation; mpMRI; primary care; Prostate cancer; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; BIOPSY; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/bco2.409
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo explore the potential impacts of incorporating prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging into primary care as a triage test within the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.Subjects and methodsDecision analytic modelling with decision trees was utilised for this early economic evaluation. A conceptual model was developed reflecting the common primary care routes to diagnosis for prostate cancer: opportunistic, asymptomatic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening or symptomatic presentation. The use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) or biparametric MRI (bpMRI) as a primary care triage test following an elevated PSA result was evaluated. A health system perspective was adopted with a time horizon of 12 months. Health effects were expressed in terms of utilities drawn from the literature. The primary outcome was prostate cancer diagnosis. Evidence used to inform the model was drawn from published primary studies, systematic reviews, and secondary analyses of primary and secondary care datasets.ResultsBase case analysis showed that the PSA pathway was dominated by both mpMRI- and bpMRI-based pathways for patients undergoing opportunistic screening and symptomatic assessment. bpMRI pathways had greater improvement in cost and utility than mpMRI pathways in both clinical scenarios. Significantly more MRI scans would be performed using the modelled approach (66 626 scans vs. 37 456 scans per 100 000 patients per annum), with fewer subsequent urgent suspected cancer referrals for both mpMRI (38% reduction for screening and symptomatic patients) and bpMRI (72% reduction for screening; 71% for symptomatic) pathways, and a small increase in number of missed cancer diagnoses. Deterministic sensitivity analyses, varying each parameter to its upper and lower 95% confidence intervals, showed no significant change in the dominance of the MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathways.ConclusionUsing prostate MRI as a second-level triage test for suspected prostate cancer in primary care could reduce health service costs without a detrimental effect on patient utility.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 864
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Detection of prostate cancer by magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in vivo
    Bourne, R
    Katelaris, P
    Danieletto, S
    Dzendrowskyj, T
    Stanwell, P
    Mountford, C
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 73 (08) : 666 - 668
  • [42] The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) in the Detection, Evaluation, and Surveillance of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa)
    Parth Patel
    Shu Wang
    Mohummad Minhaj Siddiqui
    Current Urology Reports, 2019, 20
  • [43] Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Prostate Cancer with Supervised Machine Learning Methods
    Nematollahi, Hamide
    Moslehi, Masoud
    Aminolroayaei, Fahimeh
    Maleki, Maryam
    Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (04)
  • [44] Comparison of Prostate Biopsy with or without Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection: An Observational Cohort Study
    Bryant, Richard J.
    Hobbs, Catherine P.
    Eyre, Katie S.
    Davies, Lucy C.
    Sullivan, Mark E.
    Shields, William
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Verrill, Clare L.
    Gleeson, Fergus, V
    MacPherson, Ruth E.
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Brewster, Simon F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (03) : 510 - 518
  • [45] Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Chaloupka, M.
    Bischoff, R.
    Pfitzinger, P.
    Lellig, E.
    Ledderose, S.
    Buchner, A.
    Schlenker, B.
    Stief, C.
    Clevert, D-A
    Apfelbeck, M.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2019, 73 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [46] Are Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Images Necessary for Prostate Cancer Detection on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
    Mussi, Thais Caldara
    Martins, Tatiana
    Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo
    Filippi, Renee Zon
    Lemos, Gustavo Caserta
    Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2017, 15 (03) : E447 - E454
  • [47] Comparing the Detection Performance Between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Wang, Yuh-Feng
    Lo, Chun-Yu
    Chen, Li-Yu
    Chang, Chi-Wei
    Huang, Ya-Ting
    Huang, Ya-Yao
    Huang, Yi-Hsiu
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (07) : E321 - E331
  • [48] Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging of Prostate
    Yuan, Qing
    Recchimuzzi, Debora Z.
    Costa, Daniel N.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 32 (01) : 171 - 179
  • [49] Advances in Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Walker, Stephanie M.
    Fernandez, Martina
    Turkbey, Baris
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 28 (03) : 407 - +
  • [50] Primary magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Kittner, Beatrice
    Blobel, Conrad
    Wiemer, Laura
    Hofbauer, Sebastian L.
    Fischer, Thomas
    Asbach, Patrick
    Haas, Matthias
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    Fuller, Florian
    Miller, Kurt
    Cash, Hannes
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (02) : 211 - 218