Gamification improves learning: Experience in a training activity of computer programming in higher education

被引:6
作者
Mellado, Rafael [1 ]
Cubillos, Claudio [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Escuela Comercio, Valparaiso, Chile
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Escuela Ingn Informat, Valparaiso, Chile
关键词
data structures; educational software; gamification; task complexity; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; COMPLEXITY; CLASSROOM; FEEDBACK; IMPACT; HETEROGENEITY; ACHIEVEMENT; PERFORMANCE; ENGAGEMENT; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/jcal.13000
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundEffective learning in computer programming courses has been a constant challenge for university teachers and has become a relevant competence for current professionals. The literature on gamification in learning presents mixed results, mainly due to problems in instructional design and inconsistency in gamification. Studies with positive empirical results on computer programming formative activities and showing under what conditions gamification is effective still need to be included.ObjectivesThis study aimed to quantify the effects of gamification techniques in software tools that support computer programming learning applied to data-structures university students. The study focused on determining whether there are differences in learning when using gamification techniques in online exercising formative activities. The effects of gamification on learning objectives with diverse complexity are studied.MethodsThe study was conducted on computer engineering university students following a pretest-intervention-posttest design. They were divided into control and experimental groups, where both used a bank of exercises in Moodle to support learning. The experimental group considered gamification techniques, including points, leaderboards, and badges.Results and ConclusionsGamification techniques significantly outperformed in learning gains in exercising activities without gamification. Regarding learning complexity, increasing taxonomic complexity did not negatively affect gamification learning effects. What is currently known about the subject matter? Gamification has been explored as a strategy to enhance learning motivation in various educational contexts, including computer programming Literature shows mixed quantitative results on learning improvements under gamification. Few studies cover formative exercises, deal with computer programming tasks, or use a LMS like Moodle. Lack of literature exploring the conditions for effective gamification use, and involving learning objective complexity.What does this paper add to the existing body of research? Quantifies the impact of gamification techniques on learning outcomes, specifically focusing on computer-programming in university. Provides empirical evidence on gamification significantly improving learning gains compared to non-gamified data-structures exercises Gamification is effective in tasks of diverse levels of taxonomic complexity, with consistent effectiveness regardless of learning difficulty.Implications of study findings for practitioners Gamification techniques, can be used in higher education to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes in computer programming The gamification information (e.g. points and ranking) do not require an automatic update, can be processed manually and published daily. It is effective to use gamification for learning tasks of medium-high difficulty in Moodle on computer programming topics. It is key a thoughtful instructional design when applying gamification, ensuring alignment with learning objectives and task complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:1959 / 1973
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   GAMIFICATION FOR SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION [J].
Lindberg, Susanne .
EDULEARN19: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, :1764-1773
[32]   HARRY POTTER AND THE CURSED CHILD: AN EXPERIENCE IN GAMIFICATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION [J].
Martins, Helena ;
de Sousa, Jorge Freire ;
Pacheco, Edgar ;
Schuller, Pedro ;
Carrapatoso, Beatriz .
ICERI2016: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2016, :2341-2349
[33]   Gamification with Lego in Higher Education: Experience in the Course of Logistic Distribution [J].
Bassani, Rafael Vescovi .
LEARNING AND COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGIES: LEARNING AND TEACHING, LCT 2018, PT II, 2018, 10925 :211-224
[34]   The acceptance of the online gamification learning platform by higher education students in hospitality and tourism [J].
Ng, Kenneth Shiu Pong ;
Lai, Ivan Ka Wai ;
Ng, Kwan Keung .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND LEARNING, 2022, 31 (03) :330-347
[35]   How gamification boosts learning in STEM higher education: a mixed methods study [J].
Ortiz-Rojas, Margarita ;
Chiluiza, Katherine ;
Valcke, Martin ;
Bolanos-Mendoza, Cindy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION, 2025, 12 (01)
[36]   Educational computer games and Gamification at the higher education - students' points of view [J].
Tuparova, D. ;
Tuparov, G. ;
Orozova, D. .
2020 43RD INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON INFORMATION, COMMUNICATION AND ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY (MIPRO 2020), 2020, :1579-1584
[37]   A Professional Development Framework for Higher Education Science Faculty that Improves Student Learning [J].
Cormas, Peter C. ;
Gould, Gregg ;
Nicholson, Louise ;
Fredrick, Kyle C. ;
Doan, S. Y. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2021, 71 (09) :942-952
[38]   Gamification of Learning Management Systems and User Types in Higher Education [J].
Fischer, Helge ;
Heinz, Matthias ;
Breitenstein, Marcus .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON GAMES BASED LEARNING (ECGBL 2018), 2018, :91-98
[39]   Gamification Framework for E-Learning Systems in Higher Education [J].
Bernik, Andrija .
TEHNICKI GLASNIK-TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (02) :184-190
[40]   Professional and pedagogical training of future students of higher education with elements of gamification [J].
Samodumska, Olena ;
Pushkarova, Tamara ;
Hrytsenko, Oleksandr ;
Zahorulko, Maryna ;
Pshenychna, Iryna .
EDUWEB-REVISTA DE TECNOLOGIA DE INFORMACION Y COMUNICACION EN EDUCACION, 2022, 16 (04) :52-64