Institutional implications for science and industrial capacity: policy lessons from the UK's pandemic response

被引:0
作者
Watkins, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
Srinivas, Smita [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Wield, David [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Inst Mfg, Alan Reece Bldg,17 Charles Babbage Rd, Cambridge CB3 0FS, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Inst Innovat Res, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Booth St W, Manchester M15 6PB, England
[3] Open Univ, Dev Policy & Practice, Walton Hall,Kents Hill, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, England
[4] Open Univ, Innogen Inst, Walton Hall,Kents Hill, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, England
[5] Technol Change Lab, London, England
关键词
industrial policy; institutional variety; capacity building; COVID-19; UK; science infrastructure; IMPORT SUBSTITUTION; INNOVATION; COVID-19;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scae029
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global shortages of critical equipment and supplies induced by COVID-19 forced countries to rapidly build and ramp up their indigenous testing and production capacities. However, the many ways in which institutional and organizational change occurred has not been sufficiently captured. Building domestic capacity requires the leveraging and repurposing of existing domestic scientific and technological capabilities, coupled with intensified global outreach to new and existing partners and suppliers. Using the framework of institutional variety, this paper looks at two facets of the UK's COVID emergency industrial response: (1) building its laboratory testing capabilities and (2) for increasing production of personal protective equipment; assessing the institutional capacities and relations that were leveraged in this regard. It uses these findings together with observations of 'innovation processes under emergency conditions' and the potential uses of a 'critical equipment policy' to sharpen some of the recommendations made in the UK's post-COVID Research and Development Roadmap.
引用
收藏
页码:850 / 860
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Adewale AR, 2017, FUTUR BUS J, V3, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.fbj.2017.06.001
[2]   IMPORT SUBSTITUTION - SURVEY OF POLICY ISSUES [J].
AHMAD, J .
DEVELOPING ECONOMIES, 1978, 16 (04) :355-372
[3]   WHY ISNT THE WHOLE WORLD EXPERIMENTING WITH THE EAST-ASIAN MODEL TO DEVELOP - REVIEW OF THE EAST-ASIAN MIRACLE [J].
AMSDEN, AH .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 22 (04) :627-633
[4]  
Amsden H. A., 2004, CEPAL REV, V2004, P75, DOI [https://doi.org/10.18356/334638d4-en, DOI 10.18356/334638D4-EN]
[5]  
Asheim B., 1997, EUR PLAN STUD, V5, P299, DOI [10.1080/09654319708720402, DOI 10.1080/09654319708720402]
[6]  
Baraniuk C., 2020, WIRED
[7]  
BioAscent, 2021, LIGHTHOUSE LAB FACIL
[8]   Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions [J].
Cooke, P ;
Uranga, MG ;
Etxebarria, G .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1997, 26 (4-5) :475-491
[9]  
FREEMAN C, 1995, CAMBRIDGE J ECON, V19, P5
[10]  
Heidhues F., 2011, Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, V50, P55