A global dataset of enteric methane mitigation experiments with beef cattle conducted from 1963 to 2023

被引:1
|
作者
de Ondarza, Mary Beth [1 ]
Hristov, Alexander N. [2 ]
Tricarico, Juan M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Paradox Nutr LLC, Plattsburgh, NY 12901 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, 109 AVBS Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Dairy Management Inc, 10255 W Higgins Rd,Suite 900, Rosemont, IL 60018 USA
来源
DATA IN BRIEF | 2024年 / 55卷
关键词
Ruminant; Enteric methane; Greenhouse gas mitigation; Beef sustainability; Feed additives; Nutrition;
D O I
10.1016/j.dib.2024.110666
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Data and descriptive information were gathered from 226 peer-reviewed scientific publications from beef cattle experiments in which enteric methane and other animal response variables were measured. The dataset was based on the bibliography used by Arndt et al. (2022) but expanded to also include more recent studies published from 2019 to 2023. All articles were identified for inclusion in the dataset using the "Web of Science Core Collection", the "Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau International (CABI)", and the "EBSCO Discovery Service" databases with the search terms "methane" and "enteric" in combination with "beef", "cattle", "rumen", and "ruminant". Additionally, the search term "rumen" was used in combination with "energy balance", "energy metabolism", or "energy partitioning". For dataset inclusion, it was necessary for all studies to be written in English and at a minimum, quantify feed dry matter intake and enteric methane emissions as well as provide measures of variance for these estimates. Studies were primarily designed as completely randomized, randomized block, or crossover experiments. The dataset includes 895 records (rows) and 138 variables (columns). Reported variables include publication information, experimental design, animal description, methane measurement method, diet nutrient composition, and means and measures of variance for feed dry matter intake and enteric methane emissions. Additionally, depending on the study, data reported on rumen fermentation parameters, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, weight gain, and carbon dioxide and hydrogen emissions were included. This dataset can be used to explore the efficacy of enteric methane mitigation strategies and their impact on beef cattle nutrition and production. Furthermore, the dataset can potentially be used to investigate possible nutrient and feed additive interactions. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] Effects of sustained reduction of enteric methane emissions with dietary supplementation of 3-nitrooxypropanol on growth performance of growing and finishing beef cattle
    Vyas, D.
    McGinn, S. M.
    Duval, S. M.
    Kindermann, M.
    Beauchemin, K. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 (05) : 2024 - 2034
  • [32] Addition of Tannin-Containing Legumes to Native Grasslands: Effects on Enteric Methane Emissions, Nitrogen Losses and Animal Performance of Beef Cattle
    Alecrim, Fabiano Barbosa
    Devincenzi, Thais
    Reyno, Rafael
    Mederos, America
    Zinno, Claudia Simon
    Mariotta, Julieta
    Lattanzi, Fernando A.
    Nobrega, Gabriel Nuto
    Santander, Daniel
    Gere, Jose Ignacio
    Irigoyen, Livia
    Ciganda, Veronica S.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (20)
  • [33] Hotspot Analysis of Rumen Microbiota and Methane Mitigation in Ruminants: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1998 to 2023
    Zheng, Xueyue
    Tang, Lijie
    Wang, Rong
    Zhang, Xiumin
    Wang, Min
    Wu, Duanqin
    ANIMALS, 2025, 15 (05):
  • [34] Enteric methane from lactating beef cows managed with high- and low-input grazing systems
    Chiavegato, M. B.
    Rowntree, J. E.
    Carmichael, D.
    Powers, W. J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (03) : 1365 - 1375
  • [35] Methane emissions from beef cattle grazing on semi-natural upland and improved lowland grasslands
    Richmond, A. S.
    Wylie, A. R. G.
    Laidlaw, A. S.
    Lively, F. O.
    ANIMAL, 2015, 9 (01) : 130 - 137
  • [36] Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of monensin, sunflower oil, enzymes, yeast, and fumaric acid
    McGinn, SM
    Beauchemin, KA
    Coates, T
    Colombatto, D
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2004, 82 (11) : 3346 - 3356
  • [37] Comparison of Methodologies Used to Estimate Enteric Methane Emissions and Warming Impact from 1920 to 2020 for US Beef Production
    Gilreath, Jessica
    Wickersham, Tryon
    Sawyer, Jason
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [38] Relevance of sward structure and forage nutrient contents in explaining methane emissions from grazing beef cattle and sheep
    da Cunha, Lais Leal
    Bremm, Carolina
    Savian, Jean Victor
    Zubieta, Angel Sanchez
    Rossetto, Jusiane
    Carvalho, Paulo Cesar de Faccio
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 869
  • [39] Repeatability of enteric methane determinations from cattle using either the SF6 tracer technique or the GreenFeed system
    Arbre, M.
    Rochette, Y.
    Guyader, J.
    Lascoux, C.
    Gomez, L. M.
    Eugene, M.
    Morgavi, D. P.
    Renand, G.
    Doreau, M.
    Martin, C.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (2-3) : 238 - 243
  • [40] Evaluation of the performance of existing mathematical models predicting enteric methane emissions from ruminants: Animal categories and dietary mitigation strategies
    Benaouda, Mohammed
    Martin, Cecile
    Li, Xinran
    Kebreab, Ermias
    Hristov, Alexander N.
    Yu, Zhongtang
    Yanez-Ruiz, David R.
    Reynolds, Christopher K.
    Crompton, Les A.
    Dijkstra, Jan
    Bannink, Andre
    Schwarm, Angela
    Kreuzer, Michael
    McGee, Mark
    Lund, Peter
    Hellwing, Anne L. F.
    Weisbjerg, Martin R.
    Moate, Peter J.
    Bayat, Ali R.
    Shingfield, Kevin J.
    Peiren, Nico
    Eugene, Maguy
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 255