Comparative evaluation of four endodontic rotary systems for removal of gutta-percha and sealer in root canal retreatment: In vitro study

被引:0
|
作者
Borse, Nikhil [1 ]
Sanap, Anita [2 ,6 ]
Kaur, Gunpriya [5 ]
Krishnakumar, Karishma [4 ]
Shetty, Pradeep [3 ]
Pandit, Varsha [4 ]
机构
[1] Pravara Inst Med Sci, Rural Dent Coll, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Loni, Maharashtra, India
[2] Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Dr DY Patil Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[3] Dr DY Patil Dent Sch, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Lohegaon, Maharashtra, India
[4] Bharati Vidyapeeth, Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[5] ACET, Amritsar, Punjab, India
[6] Dr DY Patil Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Pune, India
关键词
Apical third; gutta-percha; retreatment; sealer; GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT; NITI INSTRUMENTS; EFFICACY; PROTAPER; FILES; HAND;
D O I
10.4103/jicdro.jicdro_51_22
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Nonsurgical endodontic retreatment is done mainly to eliminate the persistent infection of the root canal system. Enterococcus faecalis has been identified predominantly from the failed root canals. Retreatment requires the complete removal of the root canal filling material. Objectives: The objectives of the study were to compare and evaluate the removal of gutta-percha (GP) and sealer among four different endodontic rotary systems used in retreatment cases. Materials and Methods: Eighty freshly extracted human single-rooted teeth with a single straight patent canal which was verified radiographically were used for the study. A modified step-back flare technique of biomechanical preparation was used for canal preparation by the sequential use of K-files up to size 30 at working length, then step backed by reducing 1 mm in increments to a file size 55. The obturation was done by lateral condensation method. A heated instrument was used to shear off the GP at the entrance of the canal. Teeth were sectioned at cervical level to remove crown portion, and the root portion was obtained. The roots were randomly divided into four groups for canal preparation, namely, I, II, III, and IV consisting of twenty teeth each. Group I: ProTaper Universal Retreatment System (TM). Group II: ProTaper Universal Rotary System (TM) (PTUS). GROUP III: Mtwo Retreatment System (TM). Group IV: Mtwo Rotary System (TM). Results: Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA and Tukey's Post hoc test. P <= 0.05 was used to determine significance. All instruments left filling material inside the root canal, in decreasing manner mention below. Group I < Group III < Group II < Group IV. Conclusions: Apical third area of the root canal system plays a vital role in successful outcome of the root canal treatment. In this study, all the re-treatments shown to have some amount of filling material remaining in the apical third area.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 44
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Evaluation of the Removal of Gutta Percha From the Root Canal Using Various Retreatment File Systems With and Without Magnification: An In Vitro Study
    Arun, Nishitha
    Solete, Pradeep
    Jeevanandan, Ganesh
    Antony, Delphine P.
    Sairaman, Sruthi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [2] Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Ni-Ti Rotary Instruments in Removal of Gutta-Percha During Root Canal Retreatment: An in vitro Study
    Kumar, S. Kishore
    Kumar, Mohit
    Sharma, Nikita
    Arora, Pulkit
    Bhatt, Megna
    Akkanapally, Sravyanjali
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ORAL RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [3] Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during root canal Retreatment
    Saad, Abdulhamied Y.
    Al-Hadlaq, Solaiman M.
    Al-Katheeri, Nasser H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2007, 33 (01) : 38 - 41
  • [4] Efficacy of 2 Reciprocating Systems Compared with a Rotary Retreatment System for Gutta-percha Removal
    Rios, Marcos de Azevedo
    Villela, Alexandre Mascarenhas
    Cunha, Rodrigo Sanches
    Velasco, Rafael Cortez
    De Martin, Alexandre Sigrist
    Kato, Augusto Shoji
    da Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2014, 40 (04) : 543 - 546
  • [5] Comparative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Manual and Rotary Gutta-percha Removal Techniques
    Colaco, Ashwini S.
    Pai, Vivekananda A. R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2015, 41 (11) : 1871 - 1874
  • [6] An In Vitro Study of Gutta Percha Removal Commencing from the Root Canal Undergoing Endodontic Retreatment using Different Rotary Instrumentation Systems
    Gaffoor, Faisal M. A.
    Chintu, S.
    Thota, Lavanya
    Kumar, Amit
    Thota, Gunaranjan
    Dwivedi, Vartul
    Badiyani, Bhumika Kamal
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 14 : 522 - 525
  • [7] Efficiency of Different Retrieval Techniques in Gutta-Percha Removal in Endodontic Retreatment: An In Vitro Study
    Neelima, U. Lavanya
    Alghamdi, Nuha
    Alshahrani, Abdulrahman Yahya
    Panakaje, Mangesh Shenoy
    Late, Laxmikant
    Pius, Alen
    Gavarraju, Deepthi Nirmal
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S2640 - S2642
  • [8] In Vitro Evaluation of the Effectiveness of ProTaper Universal Rotary Retreatment System for Gutta-Percha Removal with or without a Solvent
    Takahashi, Cristiane Midori
    Cunha, Rodrigo Sanches
    De Martin, Alexandre Sigrist
    Fontana, Carlos Eduardo
    Silveira, Claudia Fernandes M.
    da Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2009, 35 (11) : 1580 - 1583
  • [9] RESIDUE OF GUTTA-PERCHA AND A GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT SEALER FOLLOWING ROOT-CANAL RETREATMENT
    FRIEDMAN, S
    MOSHONOV, J
    TROPE, M
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1993, 26 (03) : 169 - 172
  • [10] A comparative evaluation of efficacy of protaper universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent
    Kumar, M. Sita Ram
    Sajjan, Girija S.
    Satish, Kalyan
    Varma, K. Madhu
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2012, 3 (06) : 160 - 163