Does fiscal expenditure matter for agricultural development? Examining the impact of technological progress on food production

被引:3
|
作者
Chandio, Abbas Ali [1 ]
Akram, Waqar [2 ]
Usman, Muhammad [3 ,4 ]
Nasereldin, Yasir A. [5 ]
Ozturk, Ilhan [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Econ, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Waikato, Sch Accounting Finance & Econ SAFE, Hamilton Campus, Hamilton, New Zealand
[3] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Ind Econ, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Sharjah, Coll Business Adm, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[7] Nisantasi Univ, Fac Econ Adm & Social Sci, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
AMG model; public investment; rice production; sustainable development; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER TEST; INVESTMENT; SECURITY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1111/rode.13118
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Rice is a staple food for vast population of China and it remarkably contributes toward China's food security. Several fiscal programs have been implemented by Chinese central government for sustainable agriculture production. In this study, we examine the long-run influence of agricultural public investment (API) and (agro)chemical inputs use (i.e., fertilizer and pesticide) on rice yield in main rice-producing provinces of China. Second-generation panel unit root tests, Westerlund error correction model cointegration test, Augmented-Mean Group (AMG) and Common Correlated Effect Mean Group (CCEMG) estimation techniques have been used in this article. The co-integration test results reveal strong evidence of the existence of the long-run co-integrating link between the considered series. The results of the AMG and CCEMG methods show that (i) API, (ii) fertilizer use, and (iii) power consumption for agricultural machinery positively and significantly impact rice productivity, whereas pesticide usage affects it negatively. Panel quantile regression showed that API, fertilizer use, power consumption, and sown area are significant and positive at 0.10-0.90 quantiles. The results also indicate that pesticide usage increases rice production at 0.10-0.30 quantiles but decreases rice production at 0.40-0.90 quantile levels. Based on these findings, we derive pertinent implications for China's food security.
引用
收藏
页码:1774 / 1802
页数:29
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Examining the impact of farm management practices on wheat production: Does agricultural investment matter?
    Chandio, Abbas Ali
    Alnafissa, Mohamad
    Akram, Waqar
    Usman, Muhammad
    Joyo, Mumtaz Ali
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (12)
  • [2] Does fiscal expenditure promote green agricultural productivity gains: An investigation on corn production
    Deng, Haiyan
    Zheng, Wangyi
    Shen, Zhiyang
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 334
  • [3] Can fiscal expenditure for agriculture mitigate the impact of climate change on agricultural production?
    Hao, Wang
    Yang, Jianqing
    Hu, Xiangdong
    Zhang, Zhenxing
    Shi, Zizhong
    Zhou, Hui
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [4] Agricultural transformation: Exploring the impact of digitalization, technological innovation and climate change on food production
    Chandio, Abbas Ali
    Akram, Waqar
    Du, Anna Min
    Ahmad, Fayyaz
    Tang, Xiaoping
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2025, 75
  • [5] Impact of technical progress and fiscal support to agriculture on agricultural carbon emissions
    Wang, Yamei
    Zhang, Tao
    Wang, Xi
    Jiang, Bo
    Huang, Xiuquan
    COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [6] IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    Vicentijevic, D.
    Acimovic, Lidija
    Stevanovic, S.
    EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2011, 58 (02): : 191 - 203
  • [7] Does rural industrial integration improve agricultural productivity? Implications for sustainable food production
    Ye, Feng
    Qin, Shengze
    Nisar, Nimra
    Zhang, Qing
    Tong, Ting
    Wang, Lang
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [8] Agricultural transformation and food and nutrition security in Ghana: Does farm production diversity (still) matter for household dietary diversity?
    Ecker, Olivier
    FOOD POLICY, 2018, 79 : 271 - 282
  • [9] Advancing sustainable development: the impact of energy transition on accelerating technological progress
    Cao, Jingzhi
    Wu, Haiquan
    Zou, Yuyou
    ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2024, 57 (02)
  • [10] Impact of export product concentration on social protection expenditure Does trade openness matter?
    Gnangnon, Sena Kimm
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2020, 47 (03) : 649 - 669