Using Participatory Implementation Science to Advance Health Equity

被引:33
作者
Ramanadhan, Shoba [1 ]
Aleman, Rosa [2 ]
Bradley, Cory D. [3 ]
Cruz, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Safaeinili, Nadia [4 ]
Simonds, Vanessa [5 ]
Aveling, Emma-Louise [6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Amer Civil Liberties Union Massachusetts, Boston, MA USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Ctr Disseminat & Implementat Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Montana State Univ, Coll Educ Hlth & Human Dev, Bozeman, MT USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA USA
关键词
community-based participatory research; implementation science; health inequities; social justice; community engagement; COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; TRANSLATING RESEARCH; KNOWLEDGE; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; DISSEMINATION; PARTNERSHIPS; DISPARITIES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060722-024251
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Participatory approaches to implementation science (IS) offer an inclusive, collaborative, and iterative perspective on implementing and sustaining evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to advance health equity. This review provides guidance on the principles and practice of participatory IS, which enables academic researchers, community members, implementers, and other actors to collaboratively integrate practice-, community-, and research-based evidence into public health and health care services. With a foundational focus on supporting academics in coproducing knowledge and action, participatory IS seeks to improve health, reduce inequity, and create transformational change. The three main sections of this review provide (a) a rationale for participatory approaches to research in implementation science, (b) a framework for integrating participatory approaches in research utilizing IS theory and methods, and (c) critical considerations for optimizing the practice and impact of participatory IS. Ultimately, participatory approaches can move IS activities beyond efforts to make EBIs work within harmful systems toward transformative solutions that reshape these systems to center equity.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 67
页数:21
相关论文
共 139 条
[21]   Stakeholder analysis: a review [J].
Brugha, R ;
Varvasovszky, Z .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2000, 15 (03) :239-246
[22]   Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review [J].
Brush, Barbara L. ;
Mentz, Graciela ;
Jensen, Megan ;
Jacobs, Brianna ;
Saylor, Kate M. ;
Rowe, Zachary ;
Israel, Barbara A. ;
Lachance, Laurie .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2020, 47 (04) :556-568
[23]  
Brydon-Miller M., 2003, Action Research, V1, P9, DOI DOI 10.1177/14767503030011002
[24]  
Camillus JC, 2001, J. Strateg. Manag., V14, P300
[25]  
Carter-Edwards L, 2020, Consortium for Implementation Science Forum: Harnessing Implementation Science to Promote Health Equity
[26]   Indigenous Storytelling and Participatory Action Research: Allies Toward Decolonization? Reflections From the Peoples' International Health Tribunal [J].
Caxaj, C. Susana .
GLOBAL QUALITATIVE NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 2 :1-12
[27]  
Christensen AJ., 2018, PRINCIPLES CONCEPTS, P679, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-93826-4_23, 10.1007/978-0-387-93826-4_23]
[28]   A Cervical Cancer Community-Based Participatory Research Project in a Native American Community [J].
Christopher, Suzanne ;
Gidley, Allison L. ;
Letiecq, Bethany ;
Smith, Adina ;
McCormick, Alma Knows His Gun .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2008, 35 (06) :821-834
[29]   A New Taxonomy for Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research [J].
Concannon, Thomas W. ;
Meissner, Paul ;
Grunbaum, Jo Anne ;
McElwee, Newell ;
Guise, Jeanne-Marie ;
Santa, John ;
Conway, Patrick H. ;
Daudelin, Denise ;
Morrato, Elaine H. ;
Leslie, Laurel K. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (08) :985-991
[30]  
Cooke N. J., 2015, ENHANCING EFFECTIVEN